Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EBNCX vs MEDIX
EBNCX vs MEDIX Comparison
Open Charts EBNCX vs MEDIX
American Funds Emerging Markets Bd C
Price$7.75
Change-$0.01 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.02B
MFS Emerging Markets Debt I
Price$11.85
Change-$0.04 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.01B
EBNCX vs MEDIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EBNCX vs. MEDIX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EBNCX is a Hold and MEDIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDIX has more cash in the bank: 7.01B vs. EBNCX (3.02B). MEDIX pays higher dividends than EBNCX: MEDIX (6.78) vs EBNCX (5.59). EBNCX was incepted earlier than MEDIX: EBNCX (9 years) vs MEDIX (27 years). EBNCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than MEDIX (0.82). MEDIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. EBNCX (43.00). MEDIX has a lower initial minimum investment than EBNCX: MEDIX (0) vs EBNCX (250). MEDIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.13 vs. EBNCX (2.91). MEDIX return over 5 years is better than : 13.31 vs. EBNCX (11.25).
| EBNCX | MEDIX | EBNCX / MEDIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.81 | 207% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.82 | 205% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.704 | 1.418 | 332% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.02B | 7.01B | 43% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.59 | 6.78 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.91 | 6.13 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.78 | 20.22 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.25 | 13.31 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 34.10 | - |