Advertisement
EBR vs PAM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EBR is a Hold and PAM is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EBR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- EBR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PAM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EBR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EBR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PAM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
EBR (@Alternative Power Generation) experienced а +0.14% price change this week, while PAM (@Electric Utilities) price change was -1.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Alternative Power Generation industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.41%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.66%.
Reported Earning Dates
EBR is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.
PAM is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Alternative Power Generation (-1.07% weekly)The alternative power generation industry consists of companies that operate power facilities converting non-conventional forms of energy into electricity. These energy forms are alternatives to fossil fuels, and many of them are derived from natural resources. Alternative energy forms include solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal steam. A major purpose behind using alternative energy – also called ‘clean’ energy - is to address concerns related to the more conventional fossil fuels, such as the latter’s high carbon dioxide emissions which is often considered a factor in global warming. Alternative power generation has been gaining traction in recent years, and could grow further in the future. Large organizations like Google have invested substantially in wind and solar energy-powered electricity. Some of the prominent U.S. companies operating in the alternative power generation industry includes Ormat Technologies, Inc., TerraForm Power, Inc. and NextEra Energy Partners LP.
@Electric Utilities (+0.48% weekly)Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.
| EBR | PAM | EBR / PAM | |
| Capitalization | 19B | 3B | 633% |
| EBITDA | 13B | 354B | 4% |
| Gain YTD | 31.162 | -7.380 | -422% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.74 | 12.73 | 187% |
| Revenue | 36.2B | 501B | 7% |
| Total Cash | 31.3B | 337B | 9% |
| Total Debt | 74.2B | 579B | 13% |
EBR | PAM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 48 Fair valued | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 42 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 18 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EBR's Valuation (48) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as PAM (78). This means that EBR’s stock grew similarly to PAM’s over the last 12 months.
PAM's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as EBR (42). This means that PAM’s stock grew similarly to EBR’s over the last 12 months.
PAM's SMR Rating (18) in the Electric Utilities industry is significantly better than the same rating for EBR (100). This means that PAM’s stock grew significantly faster than EBR’s over the last 12 months.
PAM's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as EBR (45). This means that PAM’s stock grew similarly to EBR’s over the last 12 months.
PAM's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Electric Utilities industry is significantly better than the same rating for EBR (92). This means that PAM’s stock grew significantly faster than EBR’s over the last 12 months.
| EBR | PAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 69% | 10 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 84% |
Advertisement
EBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EBR has been closely correlated with CIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EBR jumps, then CIG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EBR | 100% | +0.96% | ||
| CIG - EBR | 81% Closely correlated | -0.55% | ||
| ELP - EBR | 73% Closely correlated | -0.46% | ||
| PAM - EBR | 39% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| EGIEY - EBR | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.49% | ||
| CEPU - EBR | 33% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
PAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAM has been closely correlated with CEPU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAM jumps, then CEPU could also see price increases.