Ad is loading...
EBSCX vs GMSLX
EBSCX vs GMSLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EBSCX vs. GMSLX commentary
Feb 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EBSCX is a Hold and GMSLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EBSCX has more cash in the bank: 1.62B vs. GMSLX (158M). GMSLX pays higher dividends than EBSCX: GMSLX (1.55) vs EBSCX (0.53). EBSCX was incepted earlier than GMSLX: EBSCX (11 years) vs GMSLX (11 years). GMSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. EBSCX (0.00). EBSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMSLX: EBSCX (2500) vs GMSLX (1000000). EBSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.53 vs. GMSLX (0.64). EBSCX return over 5 years is better than : 29.60 vs. GMSLX (-2.55).
| EBSCX | GMSLX | EBSCX / GMSLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.215 | 1.000 | 322% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.62B | 158M | 1,023% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 1.55 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.53 | 0.64 | 1,963% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.14 | -2.78 | -653% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.60 | -2.55 | -1,162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.30 | 2.01 | 263% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...