Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EBSCX vs RDMAX
EBSCX vs RDMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EBSCX vs. RDMAX commentary
Jun 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EBSCX is a Hold and RDMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EBSCX has more cash in the bank: 2.01B vs. RDMAX (41.4M). RDMAX pays higher dividends than EBSCX: RDMAX (4.58) vs EBSCX (0.43). EBSCX was incepted earlier than RDMAX: EBSCX (11 years) vs RDMAX (9 years). EBSCX (2.84) is less costly to investors than RDMAX (2.54). EBSCX (0.00) and RDMAX (0.00) have comparable annual turnover. RDMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than EBSCX: RDMAX (1000) vs EBSCX (2500). EBSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.21 vs. RDMAX (-7.08). EBSCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.28 vs. RDMAX (8.74).
| EBSCX | RDMAX | EBSCX / RDMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.75 | 2.26 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.84 | 2.54 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.996 | -5.323 | -37% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 41.4M | 4,853% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 4.58 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.21 | -7.08 | -88% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.52 | -17.83 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.28 | 8.74 | 369% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.83 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement