Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EBSCX vs RDMCX
EBSCX vs RDMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EBSCX vs. RDMCX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EBSCX is a Hold and RDMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EBSCX has more cash in the bank: 1.98B vs. RDMCX (41M). RDMCX pays higher dividends than EBSCX: RDMCX (3.93) vs EBSCX (0.42). EBSCX was incepted earlier than RDMCX: EBSCX (11 years) vs RDMCX (9 years). RDMCX (3.14) is less costly to investors than EBSCX (2.84). EBSCX (0.00) and RDMCX (0.00) have comparable annual turnover. RDMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EBSCX: RDMCX (1000) vs EBSCX (2500). EBSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.37 vs. RDMCX (-11.31). EBSCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.58 vs. RDMCX (-2.13).
| EBSCX | RDMCX | EBSCX / RDMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.75 | 3.01 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.84 | 3.14 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.885 | -8.199 | -23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.98B | 41M | 4,817% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 3.93 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.37 | -11.31 | -47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.65 | -23.51 | -7% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.58 | -2.13 | -1,343% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.41 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers