EBTC
Price
$39.80
Change
-$1.14 (-2.78%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
318.88M
FFBC
Price
$23.35
Change
-$0.54 (-2.26%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.08B
33 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EBTC vs FFBC

Header iconEBTC vs FFBC Comparison
Open Charts EBTC vs FFBCBanner chart's image
Enterprise Ban
Price$39.80
Change-$1.14 (-2.78%)
Volume$18.29K
Capitalization318.88M
First Financial Ban
Price$23.35
Change-$0.54 (-2.26%)
Volume$373.8K
Capitalization2.08B
EBTC vs FFBC Comparison Chart
Loading...
EBTC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EBTC vs. FFBC commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EBTC is a StrongBuy and FFBC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (EBTC: $39.80 vs. FFBC: $23.35)
Brand notoriety: EBTC and FFBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EBTC: 80% vs. FFBC: 96%
Market capitalization -- EBTC: $318.88M vs. FFBC: $2.08B
EBTC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $318.88M. FFBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EBTC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFFBC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EBTC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FFBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the long-term than EBTC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EBTC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFBC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EBTC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FFBC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EBTC is a better buy in the short-term than FFBC.

Price Growth

EBTC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.50% price change this week, while FFBC (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

EBTC is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

FFBC is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.53% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFBC($2.08B) has a higher market cap than EBTC($319M). EBTC (8.18) and FFBC (8.15) have similar P/E ratio . EBTC YTD gains are higher at: 1.892 vs. FFBC (-11.486). FFBC has more cash in the bank: 213M vs. EBTC (45.3M). EBTC has less debt than FFBC: EBTC (110M) vs FFBC (1.28B). FFBC has higher revenues than EBTC: FFBC (840M) vs EBTC (171M).
EBTCFFBCEBTC / FFBC
Capitalization319M2.08B15%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.892-11.486-16%
P/E Ratio8.188.15100%
Revenue171M840M20%
Total Cash45.3M213M21%
Total Debt110M1.28B9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EBTC vs FFBC: Fundamental Ratings
EBTC
FFBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1653
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3922
SMR RATING
1..100
129
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4660
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1534
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a47

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFBC's Valuation (37) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EBTC (75). This means that FFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than EBTC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EBTC (39). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to EBTC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's SMR Rating (9) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EBTC (12). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to EBTC’s over the last 12 months.

EBTC's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (60). This means that EBTC’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

EBTC's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (34). This means that EBTC’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EBTCFFBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EBTC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IGNYX16.84N/A
N/A
Macquarie Natural Resources Y
GCSLX20.89N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Global Equity C
TILWX29.23N/A
N/A
Nuveen Large Cap Growth W
FESRX10.03N/A
N/A
First Eagle Small Cap Opportunity R6
FERRX11.66N/A
N/A
First Eagle Global Real Assets R6

EBTC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EBTC has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EBTC jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EBTC
1D Price
Change %
EBTC100%
-2.78%
UBSI - EBTC
77%
Closely correlated
-2.03%
NBTB - EBTC
77%
Closely correlated
-2.91%
EQBK - EBTC
77%
Closely correlated
-2.85%
SHBI - EBTC
77%
Closely correlated
-4.51%
FFBC - EBTC
77%
Closely correlated
-2.26%
More

FFBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFBC has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFBC jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFBC
1D Price
Change %
FFBC100%
-2.26%
UBSI - FFBC
92%
Closely correlated
-2.03%
CBU - FFBC
92%
Closely correlated
-2.68%
ABCB - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
-2.61%
EBC - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
-3.37%
HOPE - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
-2.97%
More