EC
Price
$9.29
Change
+$0.14 (+1.53%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
21.83B
18 days until earnings call
NFG
Price
$77.96
Change
+$0.21 (+0.27%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
4.92B
5 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EC vs NFG

Header iconEC vs NFG Comparison
Open Charts EC vs NFGBanner chart's image
Ecopetrol SA
Price$9.29
Change+$0.14 (+1.53%)
Volume$1.68M
Capitalization21.83B
National Fuel Gas
Price$77.96
Change+$0.21 (+0.27%)
Volume$486.07K
Capitalization4.92B
EC vs NFG Comparison Chart
Loading...
EC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EC vs. NFG commentary
Apr 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EC is a StrongBuy and NFG is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2025
Stock price -- (EC: $9.29 vs. NFG: $77.96)
Brand notoriety: EC and NFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EC: 60% vs. NFG: 69%
Market capitalization -- EC: $21.83B vs. NFG: $4.92B
EC [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $21.83B. NFG’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $4.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $461.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $63.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNFG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EC is a better buy in the long-term than NFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EC’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NFG’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EC’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NFG’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NFG is a better buy in the short-term than EC.

Price Growth

EC (@Integrated Oil) experienced а +1.86% price change this week, while NFG (@Integrated Oil) price change was -1.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was +1.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

EC is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

NFG is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (+1.80% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EC($21.8B) has a higher market cap than NFG($4.92B). NFG has higher P/E ratio than EC: NFG (11.18) vs EC (4.87). EC (29.559) and NFG (29.323) have similar YTD gains . EC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 49.36T vs. NFG (1.15B). EC has higher revenues than NFG: EC (148.1T) vs NFG (2.04B).
ECNFGEC / NFG
Capitalization21.8B4.92B444%
EBITDA49.36T1.15B4,284,809%
Gain YTD29.55929.323101%
P/E Ratio4.8711.1844%
Revenue148.1T2.04B7,259,755%
Total CashN/A41.7M-
Total DebtN/A2.69B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EC vs NFG: Fundamental Ratings
EC
NFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1129
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3617
SMR RATING
1..100
1090
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4341
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
182
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EC's Valuation (3) in the Integrated Oil industry is significantly better than the same rating for NFG (78). This means that EC’s stock grew significantly faster than NFG’s over the last 12 months.

NFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as EC (36). This means that NFG’s stock grew similarly to EC’s over the last 12 months.

EC's SMR Rating (10) in the Integrated Oil industry is significantly better than the same rating for NFG (90). This means that EC’s stock grew significantly faster than NFG’s over the last 12 months.

NFG's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as EC (43). This means that NFG’s stock grew similarly to EC’s over the last 12 months.

NFG's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as EC (18). This means that NFG’s stock grew similarly to EC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECNFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MDYG78.611.70
+2.21%
SPDR® S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF
STXK27.660.54
+1.97%
Strive Small-Cap ETF
MFUS48.540.55
+1.15%
PIMCO RAFI Dyn Multi-Factor US Eq ETF
FLRT46.480.16
+0.36%
Pacer Pacific Asset Fltng Rt Hi Inc ETF
REW11.36-0.95
-7.72%
ProShares UltraShort Technology

EC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EC has been loosely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EC jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EC
1D Price
Change %
EC100%
+1.53%
SHEL - EC
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
CVE - EC
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.17%
BP - EC
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.40%
SU - EC
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.48%
IMO - EC
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.46%
More

NFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NFG has been loosely correlated with XOM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NFG jumps, then XOM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NFG
1D Price
Change %
NFG100%
+0.27%
XOM - NFG
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.17%
SHEL - NFG
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
CVX - NFG
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.75%
EC - NFG
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.53%
SU - NFG
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.48%
More