Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECASX vs PAMCX
ECASX vs PAMCX Comparison
Open Charts ECASX vs PAMCX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap C
Price$28.30
Change-$0.15 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.49B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$96.01
Change+$0.40 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28B
ECASX vs PAMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECASX vs. PAMCX commentary
Jul 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECASX is a Buy and PAMCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 28B vs. ECASX (14.5B). ECASX (0.00) and PAMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . ECASX was incepted earlier than PAMCX: ECASX (16 years) vs PAMCX (25 years). ECASX (1.87) is less costly to investors than PAMCX (1.01). PAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. ECASX (9.00). ECASX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAMCX: ECASX (1000) vs PAMCX (2500). ECASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.60 vs. PAMCX (-2.05). ECASX return over 5 years is better than : 6.95 vs. PAMCX (5.54).
| ECASX | PAMCX | ECASX / PAMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.01 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.01 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.566 | 2.182 | 26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.5B | 28B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.60 | -2.05 | -127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.88 | 13.70 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.95 | 5.54 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.93 | 20.74 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement