Compare predictions ECASX vs RPMGX
ECASX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts ECASX vs RPMGX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap C
Price$24.57
Change+$0.03 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$94.56
Change+$0.32 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECASX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
ECASX vs. RPMGX commentary
Sep 28, 2023
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECASX is a Hold and RPMGX is a StrongSell.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 27.8B vs. ECASX (11.4B). ECASX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . ECASX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: ECASX (14 years) vs RPMGX (31 years). ECASX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.77). RPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.40 vs. ECASX (7.00). ECASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: ECASX (1000) vs RPMGX (2500). RPMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.69 vs. ECASX (-1.09). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : 7.70 vs. ECASX (-11.73).
| ECASX | RPMGX | ECASX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.77 | 245% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.77 | 245% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.487 | 6.595 | 23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 11.4B | 27.8B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.09 | 12.69 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.05 | -4.68 | -65% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.73 | 7.70 | -152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.23 | 109.07 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interesting Tickers