Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECASX vs RPMGX
ECASX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts ECASX vs RPMGX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap C
Price$28.24
Change-$0.32 (-1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.49B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$101.35
Change-$1.14 (-1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.79B
ECASX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECASX vs. RPMGX commentary
Jul 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECASX is a Buy and RPMGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 27.8B vs. ECASX (14.5B). ECASX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . ECASX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: ECASX (16 years) vs RPMGX (33 years). ECASX (1.87) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). RPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. ECASX (9.00). ECASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: ECASX (1000) vs RPMGX (2500). ECASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.71 vs. RPMGX (-3.37). ECASX return over 5 years is better than : 7.94 vs. RPMGX (6.77).
| ECASX | RPMGX | ECASX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.75 | 249% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.75 | 249% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.954 | 1.624 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.5B | 27.8B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.71 | -3.37 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.91 | 14.84 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.94 | 6.77 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.21 | 22.88 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers