Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECASX vs RPTIX
ECASX vs RPTIX Comparison
Open Charts ECASX vs RPTIX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap C
Price$28.56
Change+$0.11 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.49B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth I
Price$102.89
Change+$0.12 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.03B
ECASX vs RPTIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECASX vs. RPTIX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECASX is a Buy and RPTIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPTIX has more cash in the bank: 28B vs. ECASX (14.5B). RPTIX pays higher dividends than ECASX: RPTIX (0.05) vs ECASX (0.00). ECASX was incepted earlier than RPTIX: ECASX (16 years) vs RPTIX (10 years). ECASX (1.87) is less costly to investors than RPTIX (0.63). RPTIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. ECASX (9.00). ECASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPTIX: ECASX (1000) vs RPTIX (500000). ECASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.08 vs. RPTIX (-1.18). RPTIX return over 5 years is better than : 8.42 vs. ECASX (7.52).
| ECASX | RPTIX | ECASX / RPTIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.63 | 297% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.63 | 297% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.566 | 2.729 | 21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.5B | 28B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.05 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.08 | -1.18 | -176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.68 | 15.13 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.52 | 8.42 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.00 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement