Ad is loading...
Analysis and predictions ECASX vs RRMGX
ECASX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts ECASX vs RRMGX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap C
Price$27.11
Change-$0.09 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$92.20
Change+$0.20 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECASX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
ECASX vs. RRMGX commentary
Apr 25, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECASX is a Hold and RRMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 30.2B vs. ECASX (13.6B). ECASX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . ECASX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: ECASX (15 years) vs RRMGX (22 years). RRMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.70 vs. ECASX (14.00). ECASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: ECASX (1000) vs RRMGX (2500). ECASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.80 vs. RRMGX (7.75). RRMGX return over 5 years is better than : 19.69 vs. ECASX (-8.05).
| ECASX | RRMGX | ECASX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.304 | 2.541 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.6B | 30.2B | 45% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.80 | 7.75 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | -18.71 | -18.82 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.05 | 19.69 | -41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.70 | 98.07 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...