Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECASX vs RRMGX
ECASX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts ECASX vs RRMGX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap C
Price$28.45
Change+$0.15 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.49B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$89.71
Change+$0.38 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28B
ECASX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECASX vs. RRMGX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECASX is a Buy and RRMGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 28B vs. ECASX (14.5B). ECASX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . ECASX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: ECASX (16 years) vs RRMGX (23 years). ECASX (1.87) is less costly to investors than RRMGX (1.29). RRMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. ECASX (9.00). ECASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: ECASX (1000) vs RRMGX (2500). ECASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.23 vs. RRMGX (-2.95). ECASX return over 5 years is better than : 6.43 vs. RRMGX (2.39).
| ECASX | RRMGX | ECASX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.29 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.29 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.566 | 2.036 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.5B | 28B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.23 | -2.95 | -75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.72 | 11.65 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.43 | 2.39 | 270% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.55 | 15.34 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers