ECASX vs TRQZX ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?
ECASX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts ECASX vs TRQZX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap C
Price$24.57
Change+$0.03 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$95.70
Change+$0.32 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECASX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 27.9B vs. ECASX (11.4B). TRQZX pays higher dividends than ECASX: TRQZX (0.28) vs ECASX (0.00). ECASX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: ECASX (14 years) vs TRQZX (4 years). ECASX (1.89) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). TRQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.40 vs. ECASX (7.00). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECASX: TRQZX (0) vs ECASX (1000). TRQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.57 vs. ECASX (-1.09).
| ECASX | TRQZX | ECASX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.61 | 310% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.487 | 7.191 | 21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.4B | 27.9B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.28 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.09 | 13.57 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.05 | -3.61 | -85% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.73 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.23 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interesting Tickers