ECBK
Price
$14.42
Change
+$0.01 (+0.07%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
119.7M
FFNW
Price
$21.43
Change
-$0.05 (-0.23%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
189.91M
61 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ECBK vs FFNW

Header iconECBK vs FFNW Comparison
Open Charts ECBK vs FFNWBanner chart's image
ECB Ban
Price$14.42
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
Volume$4.09K
Capitalization119.7M
First Financial Northwest
Price$21.43
Change-$0.05 (-0.23%)
Volume$29.15K
Capitalization189.91M
ECBK vs FFNW Comparison Chart
Loading...
FFNW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECBK vs. FFNW commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECBK is a Hold and FFNW is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (ECBK: $14.42 vs. FFNW: $21.43)
Brand notoriety: ECBK and FFNW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECBK: 62% vs. FFNW: 118%
Market capitalization -- ECBK: $119.7M vs. FFNW: $189.91M
ECBK [@Regional Banks] is valued at $119.7M. FFNW’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $189.91M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECBK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFFNW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ECBK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FFNW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFNW is a better buy in the long-term than ECBK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFNW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FFNW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

ECBK (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.19% price change this week, while FFNW (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

ECBK is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2023.

FFNW is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFNW($190M) has a higher market cap than ECBK($120M). FFNW has higher P/E ratio than ECBK: FFNW (30.00) vs ECBK (24.90). FFNW YTD gains are higher at: -1.244 vs. ECBK (-2.830). FFNW has less debt than ECBK: FFNW (128M) vs ECBK (224M). FFNW has higher revenues than ECBK: FFNW (43.3M) vs ECBK (26.7M).
ECBKFFNWECBK / FFNW
Capitalization120M190M63%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.830-1.244227%
P/E Ratio24.9030.0083%
Revenue26.7M43.3M62%
Total CashN/A8.07M-
Total Debt224M128M175%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFNW: Fundamental Ratings
FFNW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
79
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
27
SMR RATING
1..100
76
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFNW
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FFNW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MDSPX28.08N/A
N/A
BlackRock Advantage SMID Cap Inv A
ESPCX33.63N/A
N/A
Allspring Special Small Cap Value C
ABYEX9.06N/A
N/A
AB Emerging Markets Multi-Asset Advisor
WGISX13.24-0.24
-1.78%
Wasatch International Select Instl
CLGPX17.14-0.42
-2.39%
Columbia Large Cap Growth Opp R

ECBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ECBK and OPBK have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECBK and OPBK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECBK
1D Price
Change %
ECBK100%
+0.07%
OPBK - ECBK
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
PLBC - ECBK
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.58%
FFNW - ECBK
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
LCNB - ECBK
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
RVSB - ECBK
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
More

FFNW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFNW has been loosely correlated with EFSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFNW jumps, then EFSC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFNW
1D Price
Change %
FFNW100%
-0.23%
EFSC - FFNW
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.24%
EQBK - FFNW
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.45%
BUSE - FFNW
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.65%
TSBK - FFNW
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.52%
THFF - FFNW
45%
Loosely correlated
-3.31%
More