Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECBLX vs FFRTX
ECBLX vs FFRTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECBLX vs. FFRTX commentary
Jul 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECBLX is a Hold and FFRTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRTX has more cash in the bank: 15.1B vs. ECBLX (4.1B). FFRTX pays higher dividends than ECBLX: FFRTX (7.58) vs ECBLX (6.86). ECBLX was incepted earlier than FFRTX: ECBLX (24 years) vs FFRTX (25 years). ECBLX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FFRTX (1.02). FFRTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. ECBLX (31.00). FFRTX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECBLX: FFRTX (0) vs ECBLX (1000). FFRTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.92 vs. ECBLX (5.38). FFRTX return over 5 years is better than : 39.83 vs. ECBLX (28.62).
| ECBLX | FFRTX | ECBLX / FFRTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.02 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.02 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.599 | 2.328 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 4.1B | 15.1B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.86 | 7.58 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.38 | 6.92 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.75 | 30.20 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.62 | 39.83 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.88 | 55.63 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers