Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECBLX vs FFRTX
ECBLX vs FFRTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECBLX vs. FFRTX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECBLX is a Hold and FFRTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRTX has more cash in the bank: 14.8B vs. ECBLX (4.13B). FFRTX pays higher dividends than ECBLX: FFRTX (7.68) vs ECBLX (6.96). ECBLX was incepted earlier than FFRTX: ECBLX (24 years) vs FFRTX (25 years). ECBLX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FFRTX (1.02). FFRTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. ECBLX (31.00). FFRTX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECBLX: FFRTX (0) vs ECBLX (1000). FFRTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.06 vs. ECBLX (4.84). FFRTX return over 5 years is better than : 37.27 vs. ECBLX (27.60).
| ECBLX | FFRTX | ECBLX / FFRTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.02 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.02 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.819 | 1.179 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 4.13B | 14.8B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.96 | 7.68 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.84 | 6.06 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.44 | 26.44 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.60 | 37.27 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.66 | 53.83 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement