Ad is loading...
ECCPX vs RGACX
ECCPX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts ECCPX vs RGACX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Gr C
Price$47.35
Change-$0.98 (-2.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets160.39M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$74.17
Change-$1.79 (-2.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.33B
ECCPX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCPX vs. RGACX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCPX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 304B vs. ECCPX (160M). RGACX pays higher dividends than ECCPX: RGACX (0.25) vs ECCPX (0.00). ECCPX was incepted earlier than RGACX: ECCPX (25 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. ECCPX (2.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCPX: RGACX (250) vs ECCPX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.75 vs. ECCPX (8.45). ECCPX return over 5 years is better than : 54.84 vs. RGACX (40.11).
| ECCPX | RGACX | ECCPX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.488 | 3.028 | 16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160M | 304B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.25 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.45 | 11.75 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.98 | 21.80 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.84 | 40.11 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.98 | 69.61 | 223% |