Ad is loading...
ECCPX vs RGACX
ECCPX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts ECCPX vs RGACX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Gr C
Price$42.91
Change+$4.05 (+10.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets141.94M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$66.49
Change+$6.32 (+10.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets245.76B
ECCPX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCPX vs. RGACX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCPX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 246B vs. ECCPX (142M). RGACX pays higher dividends than ECCPX: RGACX (0.09) vs ECCPX (0.00). ECCPX was incepted earlier than RGACX: ECCPX (25 years) vs RGACX (23 years). ECCPX (2.01) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ECCPX (8.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCPX: RGACX (250) vs ECCPX (1000). ECCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.27 vs. RGACX (-12.54). ECCPX return over 5 years is better than : 51.80 vs. RGACX (34.35).
| ECCPX | RGACX | ECCPX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.94 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.94 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -17.530 | -16.419 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 142M | 246B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.09 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.27 | -12.54 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.14 | -4.11 | -174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.80 | 34.35 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.14 | 36.41 | 294% |