Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECIMX vs RCWHX
ECIMX vs RCWHX Comparison
Open Charts ECIMX vs RCWHX
Eaton Vance Global Sovereign Opps C
Price$6.79
Change+$0.05 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.86M
American Funds Capital World Bond R5E
Price$16.26
Change+$0.10 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.81B
ECIMX vs RCWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECIMX vs. RCWHX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECIMX is a Hold and RCWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCWHX has more cash in the bank: 9.81B vs. ECIMX (32.9M). ECIMX pays higher dividends than RCWHX: ECIMX (3.77) vs RCWHX (3.40). ECIMX was incepted earlier than RCWHX: ECIMX (14 years) vs RCWHX (10 years). ECIMX (3.32) is less costly to investors than RCWHX (0.64). RCWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 251.00 vs. ECIMX (227.00). RCWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECIMX: RCWHX (250) vs ECIMX (1000). ECIMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.79 vs. RCWHX (5.86). ECIMX return over 5 years is better than : -2.16 vs. RCWHX (-8.67).
| ECIMX | RCWHX | ECIMX / RCWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.64 | 314% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.32 | 0.64 | 519% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.319 | 5.308 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.9M | 9.81B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.77 | 3.40 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.79 | 5.86 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.73 | 1.50 | 450% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.16 | -8.67 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.89 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement