Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECIMX vs WFBFX
ECIMX vs WFBFX Comparison
Open Charts ECIMX vs WFBFX
Eaton Vance Global Sovereign Opps C
Price$6.79
Change+$0.05 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.86M
American Funds Capital World Bond F3
Price$16.28
Change+$0.10 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.87B
ECIMX vs WFBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECIMX vs. WFBFX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECIMX is a Hold and WFBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WFBFX has more cash in the bank: 9.87B vs. ECIMX (32.9M). ECIMX pays higher dividends than WFBFX: ECIMX (3.77) vs WFBFX (3.55). ECIMX was incepted earlier than WFBFX: ECIMX (14 years) vs WFBFX (8 years). ECIMX (3.32) is less costly to investors than WFBFX (0.48). WFBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 251.00 vs. ECIMX (227.00). ECIMX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFBFX: ECIMX (1000) vs WFBFX (1000000). ECIMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.79 vs. WFBFX (6.02). ECIMX return over 5 years is better than : -2.16 vs. WFBFX (-8.06).
| ECIMX | WFBFX | ECIMX / WFBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.48 | 419% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.32 | 0.48 | 692% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.319 | 5.342 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.9M | 9.87B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.77 | 3.55 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.79 | 6.02 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.73 | 1.88 | 358% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.16 | -8.06 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.89 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement