Ad is loading...
ECLBX vs FLTEX
ECLBX vs FLTEX Comparison
Open Charts ECLBX vs FLTEX
Parametric TABS 1to10 Year Ldrd Mn Bd C
Price$10.15
Change+$0.02 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.61M
American Funds Limited Term Tx-Ex B F3
Price$15.23
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.35B
ECLBX vs FLTEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECLBX vs. FLTEX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECLBX is a Hold and FLTEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLTEX has more cash in the bank: 5.35B vs. ECLBX (68.6M). FLTEX pays higher dividends than ECLBX: FLTEX (2.74) vs ECLBX (2.10). ECLBX was incepted earlier than FLTEX: ECLBX (10 years) vs FLTEX (8 years). ECLBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FLTEX (0.26). ECLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FLTEX (33.00). ECLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLTEX: ECLBX (1000) vs FLTEX (1000000). ECLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.73 vs. FLTEX (0.94). ECLBX return over 5 years is better than : 3.11 vs. FLTEX (-2.04).
| ECLBX | FLTEX | ECLBX / FLTEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.26 | 538% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.26 | 600% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.476 | -0.392 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68.6M | 5.35B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.10 | 2.74 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.73 | 0.94 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.87 | 1.41 | 346% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.11 | -2.04 | -153% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...