Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECLBX vs MTLFX
ECLBX vs MTLFX Comparison
Open Charts ECLBX vs MTLFX
Parametric TABS 1to10 Year Ldrd Mn Bd C
Price$10.17
Change+$0.02 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.8M
MFS Municipal Limited Maturity A
Price$7.92
Change+$0.01 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.66B
ECLBX vs MTLFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECLBX vs. MTLFX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECLBX is a Hold and MTLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTLFX has more cash in the bank: 2.66B vs. ECLBX (68.8M). MTLFX pays higher dividends than ECLBX: MTLFX (2.98) vs ECLBX (2.10). ECLBX was incepted earlier than MTLFX: ECLBX (10 years) vs MTLFX (33 years). ECLBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than MTLFX (0.72). ECLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. MTLFX (30.00). ECLBX (1000) and MTLFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MTLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.53 vs. ECLBX (2.92). MTLFX return over 5 years is better than : 6.67 vs. ECLBX (1.73).
| ECLBX | MTLFX | ECLBX / MTLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.59 | 237% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.72 | 217% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.092 | 0.516 | 18% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68.8M | 2.66B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.10 | 2.98 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.92 | 3.53 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.68 | 8.40 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.73 | 6.67 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.94 | 15.45 | 51% |