Ad is loading...
ECLBX vs MTLFX
ECLBX vs MTLFX Comparison
Open Charts ECLBX vs MTLFX
Parametric TABS 1to10 Year Ldrd Mn Bd C
Price$10.15
Change+$0.02 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.61M
MFS Municipal Limited Maturity A
Price$7.91
Change+$0.01 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.62B
ECLBX vs MTLFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECLBX vs. MTLFX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECLBX is a Hold and MTLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTLFX has more cash in the bank: 2.62B vs. ECLBX (68.6M). MTLFX pays higher dividends than ECLBX: MTLFX (2.94) vs ECLBX (2.10). ECLBX was incepted earlier than MTLFX: ECLBX (10 years) vs MTLFX (33 years). ECLBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than MTLFX (0.72). ECLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. MTLFX (30.00). ECLBX (1000) and MTLFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MTLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.14 vs. ECLBX (1.73). MTLFX return over 5 years is better than : 7.84 vs. ECLBX (3.11).
| ECLBX | MTLFX | ECLBX / MTLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.59 | 237% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.72 | 217% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.476 | 0.134 | -355% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68.6M | 2.62B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.10 | 2.94 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.73 | 3.14 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.87 | 7.71 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.11 | 7.84 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 14.59 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...