Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECMBX vs FSMUX
ECMBX vs FSMUX Comparison
Open Charts ECMBX vs FSMUX
Eaton Vance AMT-Free Municipal Income C
Price$7.73
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets191.88M
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond
Price$8.61
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.57B
ECMBX vs FSMUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMUX has more cash in the bank: 12.6B vs. ECMBX (192M). FSMUX pays higher dividends than ECMBX: FSMUX (3.93) vs ECMBX (3.02). ECMBX was incepted earlier than FSMUX: ECMBX (19 years) vs FSMUX (4 years). ECMBX (1.70) is less costly to investors than FSMUX (0.44). ECMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. FSMUX (48.00). FSMUX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECMBX: FSMUX (0) vs ECMBX (1000). FSMUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.87 vs. ECMBX (-1.12).
| ECMBX | FSMUX | ECMBX / FSMUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.19 | 895% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.44 | 386% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.153 | -0.907 | 237% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 192M | 12.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.02 | 3.93 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.12 | 0.87 | -128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.76 | 8.67 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.02 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement