Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECMBX vs VWLTX
ECMBX vs VWLTX Comparison
Open Charts ECMBX vs VWLTX
Eaton Vance AMT-Free Municipal Income C
Price$7.73
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets191.88M
Vanguard Long-Term Tax-Exempt
Price$10.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.93B
ECMBX vs VWLTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECMBX vs. VWLTX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECMBX is a Hold and VWLTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VWLTX has more cash in the bank: 16.9B vs. ECMBX (192M). VWLTX pays higher dividends than ECMBX: VWLTX (3.61) vs ECMBX (3.02). ECMBX was incepted earlier than VWLTX: ECMBX (19 years) vs VWLTX (48 years). ECMBX (1.70) is less costly to investors than VWLTX (0.17). ECMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. VWLTX (28.00). ECMBX has a lower initial minimum investment than VWLTX: ECMBX (1000) vs VWLTX (3000). ECMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.12 vs. VWLTX (-3.23). ECMBX return over 5 years is better than : -8.02 vs. VWLTX (-12.21).
| ECMBX | VWLTX | ECMBX / VWLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.17 | 1,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.17 | 1,000% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 48 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.153 | -3.047 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 192M | 16.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.02 | 3.61 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.12 | -3.23 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.76 | -1.90 | -93% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.02 | -12.21 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.69 | -8.48 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers