Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECMBX vs VWLUX
ECMBX vs VWLUX Comparison
Open Charts ECMBX vs VWLUX
Eaton Vance AMT-Free Municipal Income C
Price$7.73
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets191.88M
Vanguard Long-Term Tax-Exempt Adm
Price$10.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.93B
ECMBX vs VWLUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECMBX vs. VWLUX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECMBX is a Hold and VWLUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VWLUX has more cash in the bank: 16.9B vs. ECMBX (192M). VWLUX pays higher dividends than ECMBX: VWLUX (3.69) vs ECMBX (3.02). ECMBX was incepted earlier than VWLUX: ECMBX (19 years) vs VWLUX (24 years). ECMBX (1.70) is less costly to investors than VWLUX (0.09). ECMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. VWLUX (28.00). ECMBX has a lower initial minimum investment than VWLUX: ECMBX (1000) vs VWLUX (50000). ECMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.12 vs. VWLUX (-3.23). ECMBX return over 5 years is better than : -8.02 vs. VWLUX (-12.20).
| ECMBX | VWLUX | ECMBX / VWLUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.09 | 1,889% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.09 | 1,889% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.153 | -3.047 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 50000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 192M | 16.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.02 | 3.69 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.12 | -3.23 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.76 | -1.89 | -93% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.02 | -12.20 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.69 | -8.47 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement