Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECMNX vs FJMNX
ECMNX vs FJMNX Comparison
Open Charts ECMNX vs FJMNX
Eaton Vance MN Municipal Income C
Price$9.28
Change+$0.02 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets231.4M
Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond A
Price$10.45
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets645.55M
ECMNX vs FJMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECMNX vs. FJMNX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECMNX is a Hold and FJMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FJMNX has more cash in the bank: 646M vs. ECMNX (231M). FJMNX pays higher dividends than ECMNX: FJMNX (3.61) vs ECMNX (2.57). ECMNX was incepted earlier than FJMNX: ECMNX (20 years) vs FJMNX (37 years). ECMNX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FJMNX (0.79). ECMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FJMNX (26.00). ECMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FJMNX: ECMNX (1000) vs FJMNX (2500). FJMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.31 vs. ECMNX (-2.14). FJMNX return over 5 years is better than : 0.75 vs. ECMNX (-5.77).
| ECMNX | FJMNX | ECMNX / FJMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.79 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.79 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.727 | -1.247 | 219% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 231M | 646M | 36% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.57 | 3.61 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.14 | 0.31 | -701% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.48 | 6.03 | 8% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.77 | 0.75 | -774% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.33 | 19.17 | -12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement