Ad is loading...
ECMNX vs FJMNX
ECMNX vs FJMNX Comparison
Open Charts ECMNX vs FJMNX
Eaton Vance MN Municipal Income C
Price$9.31
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets229.58M
Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond A
Price$10.44
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets653.16M
ECMNX vs FJMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECMNX vs. FJMNX commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECMNX is a Hold and FJMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FJMNX has more cash in the bank: 653M vs. ECMNX (230M). FJMNX pays higher dividends than ECMNX: FJMNX (3.59) vs ECMNX (2.53). ECMNX was incepted earlier than FJMNX: ECMNX (19 years) vs FJMNX (37 years). ECMNX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FJMNX (0.79). ECMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FJMNX (26.00). ECMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FJMNX: ECMNX (1000) vs FJMNX (2500). FJMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.68 vs. ECMNX (-1.42). FJMNX return over 5 years is better than : 3.10 vs. ECMNX (-3.99).
| ECMNX | FJMNX | ECMNX / FJMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.79 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.79 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.310 | -1.646 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 230M | 653M | 35% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.53 | 3.59 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.42 | 0.68 | -209% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.95 | 6.69 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.99 | 3.10 | -129% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.10 | 18.54 | -11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers