Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECMNX vs FKTDX
ECMNX vs FKTDX Comparison
Open Charts ECMNX vs FKTDX
Eaton Vance MN Municipal Income C
Price$9.28
Change+$0.02 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets231.4M
Franklin MN Tax-Free Inc R6
Price$10.90
Change+$0.03 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets617.48M
ECMNX vs FKTDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECMNX vs. FKTDX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECMNX is a Hold and FKTDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTDX has more cash in the bank: 617M vs. ECMNX (231M). FKTDX pays higher dividends than ECMNX: FKTDX (3.36) vs ECMNX (2.57). ECMNX was incepted earlier than FKTDX: ECMNX (20 years) vs FKTDX (8 years). ECMNX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FKTDX (0.54). ECMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FKTDX (4.25). ECMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKTDX: ECMNX (1000) vs FKTDX (1000000). FKTDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.39 vs. ECMNX (-2.14). FKTDX (-5.59) and ECMNX (-5.77) have equivalent 5 years return.
| ECMNX | FKTDX | ECMNX / FKTDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.54 | 270% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.54 | 270% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.727 | -1.313 | 208% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 231M | 617M | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.57 | 3.36 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.14 | 0.39 | -546% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.48 | 4.17 | 11% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.77 | -5.59 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement