Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECMNX vs FMNQX
ECMNX vs FMNQX Comparison
Open Charts ECMNX vs FMNQX
Eaton Vance MN Municipal Income C
Price$9.28
Change+$0.02 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets231.4M
Franklin MN Tax-Free Inc A
Price$10.88
Change+$0.02 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets617.48M
ECMNX vs FMNQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECMNX vs. FMNQX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECMNX is a Hold and FMNQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMNQX has more cash in the bank: 617M vs. ECMNX (231M). FMNQX pays higher dividends than ECMNX: FMNQX (3.07) vs ECMNX (2.57). ECMNX was incepted earlier than FMNQX: ECMNX (20 years) vs FMNQX (7 years). ECMNX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FMNQX (0.84). ECMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FMNQX (4.25). ECMNX (1000) and FMNQX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FMNQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.21 vs. ECMNX (-2.14). ECMNX return over 5 years is better than : -5.77 vs. FMNQX (-6.48).
| ECMNX | FMNQX | ECMNX / FMNQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.84 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.84 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.727 | -1.436 | 190% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 231M | 617M | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.57 | 3.07 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.14 | 0.21 | -1,015% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.48 | 3.44 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.77 | -6.48 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement