Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECMNX vs NTCCX
ECMNX vs NTCCX Comparison
Open Charts ECMNX vs NTCCX
Eaton Vance MN Municipal Income C
Price$9.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets218.91M
Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond C
Price$10.40
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets651.15M
ECMNX vs NTCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECMNX vs. NTCCX commentary
Aug 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECMNX is a Hold and NTCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTCCX has more cash in the bank: 651M vs. ECMNX (219M). NTCCX pays higher dividends than ECMNX: NTCCX (2.79) vs ECMNX (2.61). ECMNX was incepted earlier than NTCCX: ECMNX (20 years) vs NTCCX (12 years). NTCCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than ECMNX (1.46). ECMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. NTCCX (26.00). ECMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than NTCCX: ECMNX (1000) vs NTCCX (2500). NTCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.61 vs. ECMNX (-2.81). NTCCX return over 5 years is better than : -4.86 vs. ECMNX (-6.53).
| ECMNX | NTCCX | ECMNX / NTCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.59 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.59 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.402 | -1.606 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219M | 651M | 34% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.61 | 2.79 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.81 | -1.61 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.52 | 1.42 | -36% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.53 | -4.86 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.10 | 9.75 | -22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement