Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECMNX vs NTCCX
ECMNX vs NTCCX Comparison
Open Charts ECMNX vs NTCCX
Eaton Vance MN Municipal Income C
Price$9.28
Change+$0.02 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets231.4M
Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond C
Price$10.45
Change+$0.03 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets645.55M
ECMNX vs NTCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECMNX vs. NTCCX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECMNX is a Hold and NTCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTCCX has more cash in the bank: 646M vs. ECMNX (231M). NTCCX pays higher dividends than ECMNX: NTCCX (2.77) vs ECMNX (2.57). ECMNX was incepted earlier than NTCCX: ECMNX (20 years) vs NTCCX (11 years). NTCCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than ECMNX (1.46). ECMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. NTCCX (26.00). ECMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than NTCCX: ECMNX (1000) vs NTCCX (2500). NTCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.51 vs. ECMNX (-2.14). NTCCX return over 5 years is better than : -3.24 vs. ECMNX (-5.77).
| ECMNX | NTCCX | ECMNX / NTCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.59 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.59 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.727 | -1.646 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 231M | 646M | 36% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.57 | 2.77 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.14 | -0.51 | 417% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.48 | 3.49 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.77 | -3.24 | 178% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.33 | 10.74 | -22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement