ECNCF
Price
$1.86
Change
-$0.02 (-1.06%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
485.79M
SYF
Price
$61.45
Change
+$1.17 (+1.94%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
17.54B
33 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ECNCF vs SYF

Header iconECNCF vs SYF Comparison
Open Charts ECNCF vs SYFBanner chart's image
ECN Capital
Price$1.86
Change-$0.02 (-1.06%)
Volume$100
Capitalization485.79M
Synchrony Financial
Price$61.45
Change+$1.17 (+1.94%)
Volume$2.49M
Capitalization17.54B
ECNCF vs SYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECNCF vs. SYF commentary
Jun 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECNCF is a Hold and SYF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 19, 2025
Stock price -- (ECNCF: $1.86 vs. SYF: $61.45)
Brand notoriety: ECNCF: Not notable vs. SYF: Notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECNCF: 0% vs. SYF: 67%
Market capitalization -- ECNCF: $485.79M vs. SYF: $17.54B
ECNCF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $485.79M. SYF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $17.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECNCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSYF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ECNCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SYF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SYF is a better buy in the long-term than ECNCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SYF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

ECNCF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -3.12% price change this week, while SYF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -0.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

SYF is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-0.93% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SYF($17.5B) has a higher market cap than ECNCF($486M). ECNCF has higher P/E ratio than SYF: ECNCF (212.77) vs SYF (8.04). SYF YTD gains are higher at: -4.589 vs. ECNCF (-15.837). ECNCF has less debt than SYF: ECNCF (1.05B) vs SYF (16B). SYF has higher revenues than ECNCF: SYF (13.6B) vs ECNCF (208M).
ECNCFSYFECNCF / SYF
Capitalization486M17.5B3%
EBITDA30.7MN/A-
Gain YTD-15.837-4.589345%
P/E Ratio212.778.042,645%
Revenue208M13.6B2%
Total Cash22.5MN/A-
Total Debt1.05B16B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ECNCF vs SYF: Fundamental Ratings
ECNCF
SYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2760
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10023
SMR RATING
1..100
493
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5748
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9418
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SYF's Valuation (48) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ECNCF (93) in the null industry. This means that SYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ECNCF’s over the last 12 months.

SYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for ECNCF (100) in the null industry. This means that SYF’s stock grew significantly faster than ECNCF’s over the last 12 months.

SYF's SMR Rating (3) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ECNCF (49) in the null industry. This means that SYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ECNCF’s over the last 12 months.

SYF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as ECNCF (57) in the null industry. This means that SYF’s stock grew similarly to ECNCF’s over the last 12 months.

SYF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for ECNCF (94) in the null industry. This means that SYF’s stock grew significantly faster than ECNCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LITM3.460.06
+1.76%
Snow Lake Resources Ltd
PKBK19.050.11
+0.58%
Parke Bancorp
MAN39.79-0.13
-0.33%
ManpowerGroup
PRLB38.02-0.13
-0.34%
Proto Labs
DG112.31-1.01
-0.89%
Dollar General Corp

ECNCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ECNCF and ENVA have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECNCF and ENVA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECNCF
1D Price
Change %
ECNCF100%
-1.06%
ENVA - ECNCF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.07%
WD - ECNCF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
SLM - ECNCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.47%
UHAL - ECNCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.52%
SYF - ECNCF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.94%
More

SYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SYF has been closely correlated with COF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SYF jumps, then COF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SYF
1D Price
Change %
SYF100%
+1.94%
COF - SYF
88%
Closely correlated
+1.68%
BFH - SYF
86%
Closely correlated
+2.03%
AXP - SYF
84%
Closely correlated
+1.23%
DFS - SYF
83%
Closely correlated
N/A
OMF - SYF
81%
Closely correlated
+2.17%
More