Ad is loading...
ECRAF
Price
$0.86
Change
+$0.03 (+3.61%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
IPMLF
Price
$1.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

ECRAF vs IPMLF

Header iconECRAF vs IPMLF Comparison
Open Charts ECRAF vs IPMLFBanner chart's image
ECORA RESOURCES
Price$0.86
Change+$0.03 (+3.61%)
Volume$16.11K
CapitalizationN/A
Imperial Metals
Price$1.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10.51K
CapitalizationN/A
ECRAF vs IPMLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECRAF vs. IPMLF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECRAF is a Hold and IPMLF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (ECRAF: $0.86 vs. IPMLF: $1.50)
Brand notoriety: ECRAF and IPMLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECRAF: 66% vs. IPMLF: 190%
Market capitalization -- ECRAF: $378.48M vs. IPMLF: $296.76M
ECRAF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $378.48M. IPMLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $296.76M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECRAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIPMLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ECRAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IPMLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ECRAF is a better buy in the long-term than IPMLF.

Price Growth

ECRAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +6.29% price change this week, while IPMLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -4.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-1.39% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ECRAF($378M) has a higher market cap than IPMLF($297M). IPMLF YTD gains are higher at: -7.121 vs. ECRAF (-29.324). ECRAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 149M vs. IPMLF (-37.23M). IPMLF has more cash in the bank: 34.8M vs. ECRAF (5.72M). ECRAF has less debt than IPMLF: ECRAF (45.6M) vs IPMLF (228M). IPMLF has higher revenues than ECRAF: IPMLF (232M) vs ECRAF (142M).
ECRAFIPMLFECRAF / IPMLF
Capitalization378M297M127%
EBITDA149M-37.23M-400%
Gain YTD-29.324-7.121412%
P/E Ratio3.72N/A-
Revenue142M232M61%
Total Cash5.72M34.8M16%
Total Debt45.6M228M20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ECRAF vs IPMLF: Fundamental Ratings
ECRAF
IPMLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10097
SMR RATING
1..100
8786
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6061
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10071
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ECRAF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IPMLF (99). This means that ECRAF’s stock grew significantly faster than IPMLF’s over the last 12 months.

IPMLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as ECRAF (100). This means that IPMLF’s stock grew similarly to ECRAF’s over the last 12 months.

IPMLF's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as ECRAF (87). This means that IPMLF’s stock grew similarly to ECRAF’s over the last 12 months.

ECRAF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as IPMLF (61). This means that ECRAF’s stock grew similarly to IPMLF’s over the last 12 months.

IPMLF's P/E Growth Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as ECRAF (100). This means that IPMLF’s stock grew similarly to ECRAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AKR24.600.12
+0.49%
Acadia Realty Trust
CBSH71.57-0.14
-0.20%
Commerce Bancshares
SHYF13.92-0.16
-1.14%
Shyft Group (The)
SPGI503.29-7.35
-1.44%
S&P Global
ALXO1.29-0.04
-3.01%
ALX Oncology Holdings

ECRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ECRAF and ARXRF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECRAF and ARXRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECRAF
1D Price
Change %
ECRAF100%
+3.01%
ARXRF - ECRAF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMQ - ECRAF
25%
Poorly correlated
+36.66%
SGML - ECRAF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.60%
RIO - ECRAF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.91%
UURAF - ECRAF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IPMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IPMLF and AAUKF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IPMLF and AAUKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IPMLF
1D Price
Change %
IPMLF100%
N/A
AAUKF - IPMLF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AXREF - IPMLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
ECRAF - IPMLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.01%
SHTLF - IPMLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IVPAF - IPMLF
18%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
More