Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECSTX vs RMFEX
ECSTX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts ECSTX vs RMFEX
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value C
Price$26.09
Change+$0.24 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.39B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$58.02
Change+$0.32 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
ECSTX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECSTX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECSTX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. ECSTX (1.39B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than ECSTX: RMFEX (1.58) vs ECSTX (0.26). ECSTX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: ECSTX (31 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). ECSTX (1.75) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). ECSTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECSTX: RMFEX (250) vs ECSTX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.37 vs. ECSTX (1.48). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 54.01 vs. ECSTX (36.84).
| ECSTX | RMFEX | ECSTX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.62 | 282% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.62 | 282% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.226 | 6.053 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 105B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 1.58 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.48 | 9.37 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.83 | 18.90 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.84 | 54.01 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.46 | 77.06 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement