EDRVF
Price
$9.67
Change
+$0.37 (+3.98%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
19.61B
FNEC
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.07 (-77.78%)
Updated
Dec 31 closing price
Capitalization
55.2M
Ad is loading...

EDRVF vs FNEC

Header iconEDRVF vs FNEC Comparison
Open Charts EDRVF vs FNECBanner chart's image
EDP Renovaveis SA
Price$9.67
Change+$0.37 (+3.98%)
Volume$2.69K
Capitalization19.61B
First National Energy
Price$0.02
Change-$0.07 (-77.78%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization55.2M
EDRVF vs FNEC Comparison Chart
Loading...
EDRVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNEC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EDRVF vs. FNEC commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EDRVF is a Hold and FNEC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (EDRVF: $9.67 vs. FNEC: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: EDRVF and FNEC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Alternative Power Generation industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EDRVF: 44% vs. FNEC: 233%
Market capitalization -- EDRVF: $19.61B vs. FNEC: $55.2M
EDRVF [@Alternative Power Generation] is valued at $19.61B. FNEC’s [@Alternative Power Generation] market capitalization is $55.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Alternative Power Generation] industry ranges from $118.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Alternative Power Generation] industry is $6.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EDRVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFNEC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EDRVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FNEC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EDRVF and FNEC are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EDRVF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNEC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EDRVF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FNEC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EDRVF is a better buy in the short-term than FNEC.

Price Growth

EDRVF (@Alternative Power Generation) experienced а +4.94% price change this week, while FNEC (@Alternative Power Generation) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Alternative Power Generation industry was +3.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Alternative Power Generation (+3.79% weekly)

The alternative power generation industry consists of companies that operate power facilities converting non-conventional forms of energy into electricity. These energy forms are alternatives to fossil fuels, and many of them are derived from natural resources. Alternative energy forms include solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal steam. A major purpose behind using alternative energy – also called ‘clean’ energy - is to address concerns related to the more conventional fossil fuels, such as the latter’s high carbon dioxide emissions which is often considered a factor in global warming. Alternative power generation has been gaining traction in recent years, and could grow further in the future. Large organizations like Google have invested substantially in wind and solar energy-powered electricity. Some of the prominent U.S. companies operating in the alternative power generation industry includes Ormat Technologies, Inc., TerraForm Power, Inc. and NextEra Energy Partners LP.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EDRVF($19.6B) has a higher market cap than FNEC($55.2M). FNEC has higher P/E ratio than EDRVF: FNEC (2000.00) vs EDRVF (39.06). FNEC YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. EDRVF (-5.834). EDRVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.93B vs. FNEC (-25.39K). EDRVF has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. FNEC (296). FNEC has less debt than EDRVF: FNEC (706K) vs EDRVF (8.21B). EDRVF has higher revenues than FNEC: EDRVF (2.38B) vs FNEC (5.75K).
EDRVFFNECEDRVF / FNEC
Capitalization19.6B55.2M35,507%
EBITDA1.93B-25.39K-7,595,036%
Gain YTD-5.8340.000-
P/E Ratio39.062000.002%
Revenue2.38B5.75K41,304,348%
Total Cash1.31B296440,878,378%
Total Debt8.21B706K1,163,314%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EDRVF vs FNEC: Fundamental Ratings
EDRVF
FNEC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9888
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9066
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9498
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EDRVF's Valuation (52) in the null industry is in the same range as FNEC (69). This means that EDRVF’s stock grew similarly to FNEC’s over the last 12 months.

EDRVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FNEC (100). This means that EDRVF’s stock grew similarly to FNEC’s over the last 12 months.

FNEC's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as EDRVF (98). This means that FNEC’s stock grew similarly to EDRVF’s over the last 12 months.

FNEC's Price Growth Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as EDRVF (90). This means that FNEC’s stock grew similarly to EDRVF’s over the last 12 months.

EDRVF's P/E Growth Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as FNEC (98). This means that EDRVF’s stock grew similarly to FNEC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EDRVFFNEC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
53%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
41%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
69%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EDRVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNEC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EWM23.440.22
+0.95%
iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF
COWZ58.420.35
+0.60%
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
SPVU51.320.25
+0.49%
Invesco S&P 500® Enhanced Value ETF
SUSC22.710.01
+0.04%
iShares ESG USD Corporate Bond ETF
AADR72.26-0.04
-0.06%
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF

EDRVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EDRVF and NEP have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EDRVF and NEP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EDRVF
1D Price
Change %
EDRVF100%
N/A
NEP - EDRVF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
FOJCY - EDRVF
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.99%
CWEN - EDRVF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
ORA - EDRVF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
NPIFF - EDRVF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
More

FNEC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNEC and DRXGY have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNEC and DRXGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNEC
1D Price
Change %
FNEC100%
N/A
DRXGY - FNEC
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DRXGF - FNEC
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDRVF - FNEC
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DOGEF - FNEC
4%
Poorly correlated
+5.79%
EGIEY - FNEC
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.92%
More