EDRVF vs FOJCY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EDRVF is a Hold and FOJCY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EDRVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFOJCY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- EDRVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- FOJCY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Price Growth
EDRVF (@Alternative Power Generation) experienced а -4.10% price change this week, while FOJCY (@Alternative Power Generation) price change was +1.58% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Alternative Power Generation industry was -0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.23%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Alternative Power Generation (-0.08% weekly)The alternative power generation industry consists of companies that operate power facilities converting non-conventional forms of energy into electricity. These energy forms are alternatives to fossil fuels, and many of them are derived from natural resources. Alternative energy forms include solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal steam. A major purpose behind using alternative energy – also called ‘clean’ energy - is to address concerns related to the more conventional fossil fuels, such as the latter’s high carbon dioxide emissions which is often considered a factor in global warming. Alternative power generation has been gaining traction in recent years, and could grow further in the future. Large organizations like Google have invested substantially in wind and solar energy-powered electricity. Some of the prominent U.S. companies operating in the alternative power generation industry includes Ormat Technologies, Inc., TerraForm Power, Inc. and NextEra Energy Partners LP.
| EDRVF | FOJCY | EDRVF / FOJCY | |
| Capitalization | 19.6B | 12.2B | 161% |
| EBITDA | 1.93B | 1.92B | 100% |
| Gain YTD | -42.047 | 10.476 | -401% |
| P/E Ratio | 39.06 | 6.51 | 600% |
| Revenue | 2.38B | 9.19B | 26% |
| Total Cash | 1.31B | 3.73B | 35% |
| Total Debt | 8.21B | 6.17B | 133% |
EDRVF | FOJCY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 91 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 57 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 38 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FOJCY's Valuation (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EDRVF (59). This means that FOJCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than EDRVF’s over the last 12 months.
EDRVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as FOJCY (100). This means that EDRVF’s stock grew similarly to FOJCY’s over the last 12 months.
FOJCY's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EDRVF (97). This means that FOJCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than EDRVF’s over the last 12 months.
FOJCY's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as EDRVF (89). This means that FOJCY’s stock grew similarly to EDRVF’s over the last 12 months.
FOJCY's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EDRVF (90). This means that FOJCY’s stock grew significantly faster than EDRVF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BEXUX | 15.12 | -0.08 | -0.53% |
| Baron Emerging Markets R6 | |||
| GCVTX | 26.98 | -0.15 | -0.55% |
| Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts Inv | |||
| JSVSX | 17.42 | -0.15 | -0.85% |
| Janus Henderson Small-Mid Cap Value S | |||
| NESYX | 60.86 | -0.79 | -1.28% |
| Natixis US Equity Opportunities Y | |||
| RFNHX | 85.89 | -1.26 | -1.45% |
| American Funds Fundamental Invs R5E | |||
EDRVF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EDRVF and NEP have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EDRVF and NEP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EDRVF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDRVF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NEP - EDRVF | 32% Poorly correlated | -3.24% | ||
| FOJCY - EDRVF | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.40% | ||
| CWEN - EDRVF | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.73% | ||
| ORA - EDRVF | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.60% | ||
| NPIFF - EDRVF | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.37% | ||
More | ||||
FOJCY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FOJCY and EDRVF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FOJCY and EDRVF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FOJCY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOJCY | 100% | +1.40% | ||
| EDRVF - FOJCY | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NPIFF - FOJCY | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.37% | ||
| AY - FOJCY | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.05% | ||
| INGXF - FOJCY | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.40% | ||
| BEPC - FOJCY | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.82% | ||
More | ||||