EDRVF vs NPIFF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EDRVF is a Hold and NPIFF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EDRVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNPIFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- EDRVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NPIFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EDRVF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NPIFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EDRVF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
- NPIFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
EDRVF (@Alternative Power Generation) experienced а -5.88% price change this week, while NPIFF (@Alternative Power Generation) price change was -4.25% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Alternative Power Generation industry was -3.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.41%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Alternative Power Generation (-3.22% weekly)The alternative power generation industry consists of companies that operate power facilities converting non-conventional forms of energy into electricity. These energy forms are alternatives to fossil fuels, and many of them are derived from natural resources. Alternative energy forms include solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal steam. A major purpose behind using alternative energy – also called ‘clean’ energy - is to address concerns related to the more conventional fossil fuels, such as the latter’s high carbon dioxide emissions which is often considered a factor in global warming. Alternative power generation has been gaining traction in recent years, and could grow further in the future. Large organizations like Google have invested substantially in wind and solar energy-powered electricity. Some of the prominent U.S. companies operating in the alternative power generation industry includes Ormat Technologies, Inc., TerraForm Power, Inc. and NextEra Energy Partners LP.
| EDRVF | NPIFF | EDRVF / NPIFF | |
| Capitalization | 19.6B | 4.85B | 404% |
| EBITDA | 1.93B | 1.95B | 99% |
| Gain YTD | -48.681 | -30.425 | 160% |
| P/E Ratio | 39.06 | 9.22 | 424% |
| Revenue | 2.38B | 2.38B | 100% |
| Total Cash | 1.31B | 978M | 133% |
| Total Debt | 8.21B | 7B | 117% |
EDRVF | NPIFF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 84 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | 75 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 41 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NPIFF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EDRVF (56). This means that NPIFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EDRVF’s over the last 12 months.
NPIFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as EDRVF (100). This means that NPIFF’s stock grew similarly to EDRVF’s over the last 12 months.
NPIFF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as EDRVF (98). This means that NPIFF’s stock grew similarly to EDRVF’s over the last 12 months.
NPIFF's Price Growth Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as EDRVF (88). This means that NPIFF’s stock grew similarly to EDRVF’s over the last 12 months.
NPIFF's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as EDRVF (93). This means that NPIFF’s stock grew similarly to EDRVF’s over the last 12 months.
| EDRVF | NPIFF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 41% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 4 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 73% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GSGRX | 46.44 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs Equity Income A | |||
| MMCGX | 24.21 | N/A | N/A |
| Morgan Stanley Inst Discovery R6 | |||
| MLPDX | 5.77 | -0.13 | -2.20% |
| Invesco SteelPath MLP Income A | |||
| CLBAX | 34.19 | -0.81 | -2.31% |
| American Funds American Balanced 529A | |||
| EUGAX | 24.28 | -0.69 | -2.76% |
| Morgan Stanley Europe Opportunity A | |||
EDRVF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EDRVF and NEP have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EDRVF and NEP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EDRVF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDRVF | 100% | -0.77% | ||
| NEP - EDRVF | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.85% | ||
| FOJCY - EDRVF | 26% Poorly correlated | -6.55% | ||
| CWEN - EDRVF | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.65% | ||
| ORA - EDRVF | 26% Poorly correlated | -5.99% | ||
| NPIFF - EDRVF | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.86% | ||
More | ||||
NPIFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NPIFF has been loosely correlated with BEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NPIFF jumps, then BEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NPIFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NPIFF | 100% | -0.86% | ||
| BEP - NPIFF | 57% Loosely correlated | -3.70% | ||
| BEPC - NPIFF | 55% Loosely correlated | -4.10% | ||
| INGXF - NPIFF | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.28% | ||
| ORA - NPIFF | 46% Loosely correlated | -5.99% | ||
| AQN - NPIFF | 45% Loosely correlated | -3.14% | ||
More | ||||