Ad is loading...
EDVMF
Price
$19.18
Change
-$0.12 (-0.62%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
115 days until earnings call
HL
Price
$5.50
Change
-$0.10 (-1.79%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
86 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EDVMF vs HL

Header iconEDVMF vs HL Comparison
Open Charts EDVMF vs HLBanner chart's image
ENDEAVOUR Mining
Price$19.18
Change-$0.12 (-0.62%)
Volume$2.34K
CapitalizationN/A
Hecla Mining
Price$5.50
Change-$0.10 (-1.79%)
Volume$31.11M
CapitalizationN/A
EDVMF vs HL Comparison Chart
Loading...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EDVMF vs. HL commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EDVMF is a Hold and HL is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (EDVMF: $19.18 vs. HL: $5.50)
Brand notoriety: EDVMF: Not notable vs. HL: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EDVMF: 21% vs. HL: 246%
Market capitalization -- EDVMF: $5.97B vs. HL: $3.01B
EDVMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $5.97B. HL’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EDVMF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EDVMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EDVMF and HL are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

EDVMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -12.20% price change this week, while HL (@Precious Metals) price change was -4.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

EDVMF is expected to report earnings on Mar 13, 2025.

HL is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EDVMF($5.97B) has a higher market cap than HL($3.01B). HL has higher P/E ratio than EDVMF: HL (1111.11) vs EDVMF (68.97). HL YTD gains are higher at: 14.897 vs. EDVMF (-10.400). EDVMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 810M vs. HL (124M). EDVMF has more cash in the bank: 813M vs. HL (106M). HL has less debt than EDVMF: HL (663M) vs EDVMF (896M). EDVMF has higher revenues than HL: EDVMF (2.41B) vs HL (720M).
EDVMFHLEDVMF / HL
Capitalization5.97B3.01B199%
EBITDA810M124M653%
Gain YTD-10.40014.897-70%
P/E Ratio68.971111.116%
Revenue2.41B720M335%
Total Cash813M106M767%
Total Debt896M663M135%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EDVMF vs HL: Fundamental Ratings
EDVMF
HL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6449
SMR RATING
1..100
8987
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7861
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
31
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a49

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EDVMF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HL (97) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that EDVMF’s stock grew significantly faster than HL’s over the last 12 months.

HL's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as EDVMF (64) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to EDVMF’s over the last 12 months.

HL's SMR Rating (87) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as EDVMF (89) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to EDVMF’s over the last 12 months.

HL's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as EDVMF (78) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to EDVMF’s over the last 12 months.

HL's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as EDVMF (3) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to EDVMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IVOIX20.51-0.15
-0.73%
Delaware Ivy Mid Cap Income Opps I
RWIGX67.23-0.72
-1.06%
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc R6
FAOSX32.94-0.42
-1.26%
Fidelity Advisor Overseas Z
TSRPX20.79-0.33
-1.56%
Nuveen Quant Small Cap Equity Premier
RYCFX49.93-2.32
-4.44%
Rydex Biotechnology C

EDVMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EDVMF has been loosely correlated with HL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EDVMF jumps, then HL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EDVMF
1D Price
Change %
EDVMF100%
-0.60%
HL - EDVMF
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.79%
AEM - EDVMF
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.13%
AGI - EDVMF
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.13%
PAAS - EDVMF
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.15%
GOLD - EDVMF
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
More

HL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HL has been closely correlated with CDE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HL jumps, then CDE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HL
1D Price
Change %
HL100%
-1.79%
CDE - HL
85%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
FSM - HL
84%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
PAAS - HL
84%
Closely correlated
-2.15%
MAG - HL
81%
Closely correlated
-1.97%
AG - HL
81%
Closely correlated
-1.63%
More