EEFT vs PINC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEFT is a StrongBuy and PINC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EEFT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePINC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- EEFT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PINC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EEFT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PINC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EEFT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- PINC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
EEFT (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.08% price change this week, while PINC (@Packaged Software) price change was -2.76% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.48%.
Reported Earning Dates
EEFT is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.
PINC is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+4.90% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| EEFT | PINC | EEFT / PINC | |
| Capitalization | 4.97B | 2.58B | 193% |
| EBITDA | 589M | 374M | 157% |
| Gain YTD | 4.789 | -1.374 | -349% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.75 | 15.48 | 128% |
| Revenue | 3.69B | 1.32B | 280% |
| Total Cash | 1.78B | 371M | 480% |
| Total Debt | 2.01B | 169M | 1,191% |
EEFT | PINC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 53 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 55 Fair valued | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 37 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 52 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PINC's Valuation (4) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EEFT (55) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that PINC’s stock grew somewhat faster than EEFT’s over the last 12 months.
PINC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as EEFT (100) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that PINC’s stock grew similarly to EEFT’s over the last 12 months.
EEFT's SMR Rating (37) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PINC (79) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that EEFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than PINC’s over the last 12 months.
EEFT's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as PINC (50) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that EEFT’s stock grew similarly to PINC’s over the last 12 months.
PINC's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as EEFT (81) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that PINC’s stock grew similarly to EEFT’s over the last 12 months.
| EEFT | PINC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 20 days ago 47% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 38% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BIAYX | 10.74 | N/A | N/A |
| Brown Advisory Sustainable Sml-Cp Cr Inv | |||
| RTXAX | 12.60 | -0.03 | -0.24% |
| Russell Inv Tax-Managed Real Assets A | |||
| HERIX | 10.36 | -0.08 | -0.77% |
| Hartford Emerging Markets Equity I | |||
| AVASX | 25.51 | -0.20 | -0.78% |
| American Beacon Large Cap Value Adv | |||
| RLLGX | 73.28 | -0.61 | -0.83% |
| American Funds SMALLCAP World R6 | |||
EEFT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEFT has been loosely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EEFT jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEFT | 100% | -0.20% | ||
| CLSK - EEFT | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| SSNC - EEFT | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| DJCO - EEFT | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.02% | ||
| SPSC - EEFT | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| RIOT - EEFT | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
More | ||||
PINC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PINC has been loosely correlated with GDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PINC jumps, then GDC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PINC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PINC | 100% | -2.71% | ||
| GDC - PINC | 61% Loosely correlated | +4.74% | ||
| SSNC - PINC | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| UPBD - PINC | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.83% | ||
| OLO - PINC | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.78% | ||
| EEFT - PINC | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.20% | ||
More | ||||