EEM
Price
$60.28
Change
-$0.16 (-0.26%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Net Assets
26.79B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IEMG
Price
$73.94
Change
-$0.20 (-0.27%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Net Assets
144B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EEM vs IEMG

Header iconEEM vs IEMG Comparison
Open Charts EEM vs IEMGBanner chart's image
EEM vs IEMG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) vs. iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG)

Key Takeaways

  • EEM tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index focusing on large- and mid-cap stocks with 1,224 holdings, while IEMG follows the broader MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index including small-caps with 2,663 holdings for greater diversification.
  • IEMG offers a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.09% compared to EEM's 0.72%, enhancing long-term cost efficiency for investors.
  • Both ETFs exhibit similar sector exposures, led by information technology (EEM: 32.94%, IEMG: 31.05%) and financials, but IEMG provides more comprehensive coverage across market caps.
  • IEMG demonstrates a slightly lower 3-year standard deviation (12.94% vs. EEM's 13.42%), suggesting marginally better risk-adjusted positioning in volatile emerging markets.
  • Recent capital flows favor broader emerging markets exposure amid a weakening U.S. dollar and AI-driven growth in Asian tech sectors.
  • Liquidity is higher for EEM with greater average daily volume, appealing to traders, while IEMG suits buy-and-hold strategies due to scale and lower costs.

Introduction

Emerging markets ETFs like EEM and IEMG offer investors targeted exposure to high-growth economies outside developed markets. These funds compete directly within the diversified emerging markets category but differ in scope and cost structure. EEM provides focused large- and mid-cap access, while IEMG delivers broader all-cap coverage at a fraction of the expense ratio. Amid a weakening U.S. dollar, robust EM earnings growth projected at 14% for 2026, and sector rotation toward Asian technology amid AI demand, comparing their structural profiles helps investors align exposure with current market dynamics and long-term diversification goals.

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) Overview

The iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) is a passive fund launched in 2003 that tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, emphasizing large- and mid-capitalization equities across 24 emerging countries. It holds 1,224 securities, providing concentrated exposure to key players. Top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (13.59%), Samsung Electronics Ltd (5.53%), and Tencent Holdings Ltd (4.07%). Sector allocations feature information technology at 32.94%, financials at 20.62%, and consumer discretionary at 10.15%. The expense ratio stands at 0.72%, with semi-annual distributions. Key metrics include a P/E ratio of 17.58, P/B of 2.48, and 30-day SEC yield of 1.03%. EEM's structure suits investors seeking liquidity and benchmark-like replication of EM large-caps.

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) Overview

The iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG), launched in 2012, passively tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index, capturing large-, mid-, and small-cap equities for broader market representation across emerging economies. It comprises 2,663 holdings. Leading positions are Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (11.60%), Samsung Electronics Ltd (4.79%), and Tencent Holdings Ltd (3.55%). Sectors are dominated by information technology (31.05%), financials (19.50%), and consumer discretionary (10.20%). With an ultra-low expense ratio of 0.09% and semi-annual payouts, it boasts a P/E of 17.55, P/B of 2.33, and 30-day SEC yield of 1.69%. IEMG's extended diversification appeals to cost-conscious investors pursuing comprehensive EM growth.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Emerging markets are buoyed by a cyclical upswing, representing 41% of global GDP with 3.3% growth forecasted for 2026, outpacing developed economies. A weakening U.S. dollar—down 8% in 2025 and projected to fall further—eases debt burdens and boosts returns for unhedged investors. Capital flows into EM ETFs reached $40 billion in 2025, driven by non-U.S. equity rotation capturing 51% of global flows. Asian EMs lead via AI infrastructure demand, powering tech-heavy sectors. Macro tailwinds include narrowing rate differentials, resilient sovereign balance sheets, and diversification from U.S. equities. Risks persist from geopolitical tensions and commodity volatility, but improving fundamentals and light positioning signal upside potential.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, both ETFs have mirrored EM strength, with 1-year NAV returns near 33% through late 2025 amid tech-led rallies. IEMG edges EEM in 3-year annualized returns (16.28% vs. 15.80%) and 5-year (4.60% vs. 3.50%), benefiting from small-cap participation during recoveries. Volatility profiles align closely, with IEMG's 3-year standard deviation at 12.94% versus EEM's 13.42%, and betas of 0.72 and 0.74, respectively. Relative positioning favors IEMG's cost edge and breadth in sector rotations toward AI enablers like semiconductors, while EEM offers tighter large-cap focus amid U.S. dollar weakness and EM earnings momentum. Year-to-date flows underscore investor preference for diversified EM exposure.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI-driven trading bots under prevailing market conditions. Tickeron provides hundreds of AI bots scanning thousands of tickers across various timeframes, strategies like momentum, mean reversion, and pattern recognition, with performance metrics including win rates, profit factors, and drawdowns. Only the strongest, real-time performers rise to this curated section, adapting to volatility in sectors like emerging markets tech. Investors can explore, backtest, and deploy these bots for automated trading signals on ETFs such as EEM and IEMG. Visit the page to identify bots aligning with your risk profile and market outlook.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors IEMG with moderate conviction (65-75% probability edge). Its superior cost structure (0.09% expense ratio), extensive diversification (2,663 holdings including small-caps), and consistent trend capture in recent EM upcycles outweigh EEM’s liquidity premium. Amid weakening dollar trends and broadening EM momentum beyond large-caps, IEMG’s profile enhances risk-adjusted returns and structural resilience.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
EEM vs. IEMG commentary
Apr 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEM is a Buy and IEMG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IEMG has more net assets: 144B vs. EEM (26.8B). EEM (10.181) and IEMG (9.997) have matching annual dividend yield . EEM was incepted earlier than IEMG: EEM (23 years) vs IEMG (13 years). IEMG (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than EEM (0.72). EEM has a higher turnover IEMG (6.00) vs IEMG (6.00).
EEMIEMGEEM / IEMG
Gain YTD10.1819.997102%
Net Assets26.8B144B19%
Total Expense Ratio0.720.09800%
Turnover8.006.00133%
Yield2.162.6881%
Fund Existence23 years13 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EEMIEMG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EEM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IEMG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IFRA59.770.57
+0.96%
iShares US Infrastructure ETF
SPSK18.040.04
+0.22%
SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF
YALL43.100.09
+0.21%
God Bless America ETF
CSNR37.76-0.04
-0.11%
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Act ETF
DZZ2.61-0.02
-0.77%
DB Gold Double Short ETN

EEM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEM has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEM jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EEM
1D Price
Change %
EEM100%
-0.26%
BABA - EEM
76%
Closely correlated
+1.88%
JD - EEM
70%
Closely correlated
+1.03%
KC - EEM
70%
Closely correlated
+1.50%
BILI - EEM
69%
Closely correlated
-2.14%
BIDU - EEM
67%
Closely correlated
-4.65%
More