EEM
Price
$70.79
Change
+$2.23 (+3.25%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Net Assets
30.32B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IEMG
Price
$85.63
Change
+$2.61 (+3.14%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Net Assets
160.98B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EEM vs IEMG

EEM vs IEMG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) vs. iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG)

Key Takeaways

  • EEM tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, focusing on large- and mid-cap equities across 24 emerging markets, with 1,224 holdings and a 0.72% expense ratio.
  • IEMG follows the broader MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index, including small-caps with 2,663 holdings and a significantly lower 0.09% expense ratio, offering greater diversification.
  • Both ETFs share similar top holdings like TSM and Samsung Electronics, and sector exposures dominated by information technology (around 32%) and financials (around 20%).
  • IEMG provides enhanced breadth through small-cap inclusion, potentially reducing concentration risk, while EEM offers superior daily liquidity with higher trading volume.
  • Cost efficiency favors IEMG for long-term holders, though EEM's established liquidity appeals to active traders in volatile emerging markets.
  • Relative positioning hinges on investor preference for cost savings and diversification versus trading efficiency.

Introduction

Investors seeking exposure to emerging markets often compare EEM and IEMG, two iShares ETFs from BlackRock targeting high-growth developing economies. While both provide passive access to equities in countries like Taiwan, China, India, and South Korea, they differ in scope and cost. EEM emphasizes large- and mid-cap leaders, suiting those prioritizing liquidity. IEMG extends to small-caps for broader sector exposure and lower fees, appealing to cost-conscious allocators. In today's environment of shifting U.S. interest rates and geopolitical tensions, this ETF comparison highlights structural nuances for diversified emerging markets positioning.

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) Overview

The iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) is a passive fund launched in 2003, tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. This index captures large- and mid-capitalization equities from 24 emerging markets, representing established companies driving regional growth. EEM holds 1,224 securities, with top holdings including Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM, 13.59%), Samsung Electronics (5.53%), and Tencent Holdings (4.07%). Sector allocations tilt toward information technology (32.94%), financials (20.62%), and consumer discretionary (10.15%). Its expense ratio stands at 0.72%, reflecting premium liquidity—average daily volume exceeds 40 million shares. EEM rebalances with the index, maintaining market-cap weighting without leverage or active overlays, ideal for core exposure with tight bid-ask spreads.

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) Overview

The iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG), inception 2012, passively replicates the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index, encompassing large-, mid-, and small-cap stocks for comprehensive coverage. With 2,663 holdings, it dilutes concentration risk compared to large-cap peers. Top positions mirror EEM but at lower weights: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (11.60%), Samsung Electronics (4.79%), and Tencent Holdings (3.55%). Sectors align closely—information technology (31.05%), financials (19.50%), consumer discretionary (10.20%)—yet small-cap inclusion enhances diversification. Boasting a low 0.09% expense ratio, IEMG supports cost-efficient holding amid semi-annual distributions and market-cap rebalancing. Its structure suits long-term investors valuing breadth over ultra-high liquidity.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Emerging markets face a dynamic landscape shaped by macroeconomic drivers like U.S. Federal Reserve policy, commodity price swings, and geopolitical shifts in Asia and Latin America. Technology and financial sectors dominate both ETFs, buoyed by AI demand and digital transformation, though regulatory scrutiny in China poses risks. Capital flows favor India and Taiwan amid supply chain reshoring, while Brazil benefits from energy transitions. Broader catalysts include easing global inflation and potential rate cuts, spurring equity rotation into high-growth regions. Sector risks encompass currency volatility and policy uncertainty, underscoring the need for diversified exposure profiles in these funds.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, EEM and IEMG have exhibited correlated trajectories, reflecting shared large-cap anchors, yet IEMG's small-cap tilt introduces nuanced volatility differences. In recent weeks amid tech rallies, both benefited from heavy Taiwan and Korea weightings, with relative positioning stable due to overlapping exposures. EEM's liquidity edge shines during rotations, enabling efficient entries amid geopolitical flares, while IEMG's lower costs compound favorably over months. Performance drivers tie to sector momentum—technology outperformance offsets financials' rate sensitivity—and macro shifts like dollar weakness boosting EM currencies. IEMG often edges in risk-adjusted metrics via broader holdings, though EEM leads in high-volume trading environments.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI-driven trading bots under prevailing market conditions. Tickeron provides hundreds of AI bots scanning thousands of tickers across various timeframes, strategies like trend-following or mean reversion, and performance metrics including win rates and drawdowns. Only the strongest, real-time performers rise to this curated section, helping traders identify tools aligned with current volatility or momentum. Users can explore bots tailored to ETFs like EEM and IEMG, backtested across cycles. For investors navigating emerging markets, reviewing these bots offers data-driven signals. Visit the page to discover leading options and elevate your strategy today.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors IEMG due to its superior cost efficiency (0.09% vs. 0.72%), extensive diversification (2,663 holdings including small-caps), and consistent trend alignment in recent cycles. While EEM excels in liquidity, IEMG's structural advantages—lower concentration, broader exposure—position it probabilistically stronger for medium-term outperformance amid EM momentum, barring acute trading demands.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
EEM vs. IEMG commentary
Jun 19, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEM is a Hold and IEMG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IEMG has more net assets: 161B vs. EEM (30.3B). EEM has a higher annual dividend yield than IEMG: EEM (25.966) vs IEMG (24.498). EEM was incepted earlier than IEMG: EEM (23 years) vs IEMG (14 years). IEMG (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than EEM (0.72). EEM has a higher turnover IEMG (6.00) vs IEMG (6.00).
EEMIEMGEEM / IEMG
Gain YTD25.96624.498106%
Net Assets30.3B161B19%
Total Expense Ratio0.720.09800%
Turnover8.006.00133%
Yield1.772.2180%
Fund Existence23 years14 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EEMIEMG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EEM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IEMG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SDD8.990.21
+2.37%
ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600
GMEU8.000.04
+0.50%
T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF
VAMO35.400.02
+0.04%
Cambria Value and Momentum ETF
JAVA78.91-0.88
-1.10%
JPMorgan Active Value ETF
VGSR11.28-0.22
-1.88%
Vert Global Sustainable Real Estate ETF

EEM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEM has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEM jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EEM
1D Price
Change %
EEM100%
-0.12%
BABA - EEM
76%
Closely correlated
-3.18%
JD - EEM
70%
Closely correlated
-1.66%
KC - EEM
70%
Closely correlated
-3.16%
BILI - EEM
69%
Closely correlated
-0.69%
BIDU - EEM
67%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
More

IEMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEMG has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IEMG jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IEMG
1D Price
Change %
IEMG100%
-0.16%
BABA - IEMG
75%
Closely correlated
-3.18%
JD - IEMG
69%
Closely correlated
-1.66%
BILI - IEMG
68%
Closely correlated
-0.69%
BIDU - IEMG
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.98%
BZUN - IEMG
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
More