Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMA vs FLAX
EEMA vs FLAX Comparison
Open Charts EEMA vs FLAX
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Price$83.06
Change+$0.33 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.35B
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
Price$26.15
Change+$0.07 (+0.27%)
Volume$100
Net Assets31.47M
EEMA vs FLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMA vs. FLAX commentary
Jul 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMA is a Buy and FLAX is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEMA has more net assets: 1.35B vs. FLAX (31.5M). EEMA (15.604) and FLAX (15.546) have matching annual dividend yield . EEMA was incepted earlier than FLAX: EEMA (13 years) vs FLAX (7 years). FLAX (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than EEMA (0.49). EEMA has a higher turnover FLAX (4.50) vs FLAX (4.50).
| EEMA | FLAX | EEMA / FLAX | |
| Gain YTD | 15.604 | 15.546 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 1.35B | 31.5M | 4,279% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.19 | 258% |
| Turnover | 7.00 | 4.50 | 156% |
| Yield | 1.44 | 1.98 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EEMA | FLAX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 80% | 8 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 79% | 21 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EEMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEMA has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEMA jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEMA | 100% | -0.11% | ||
| BABA - EEMA | 79% Closely correlated | -3.85% | ||
| KC - EEMA | 72% Closely correlated | -4.30% | ||
| BILI - EEMA | 71% Closely correlated | -3.54% | ||
| JD - EEMA | 70% Closely correlated | -3.36% | ||
| BIDU - EEMA | 67% Closely correlated | -1.79% | ||
More | ||||