Ad is loading...
EEMCX vs FNWFX
EEMCX vs FNWFX Comparison
Open Charts EEMCX vs FNWFX
Columbia Emerging Markets C
Price$12.33
Change+$0.04 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets742.01M
American Funds New World F3
Price$81.74
Change+$0.22 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.85B
EEMCX vs FNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMCX vs. FNWFX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMCX is a StrongBuy and FNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 63.8B vs. EEMCX (742M). FNWFX pays higher dividends than EEMCX: FNWFX (1.21) vs EEMCX (0.36). EEMCX was incepted earlier than FNWFX: EEMCX (18 years) vs FNWFX (8 years). EEMCX (2.29) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). EEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FNWFX (37.00). EEMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: EEMCX (2000) vs FNWFX (1000000). EEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.23 vs. FNWFX (3.79). FNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.68 vs. EEMCX (14.23).
| EEMCX | FNWFX | EEMCX / FNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.18 | 0.57 | 382% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.29 | 0.57 | 402% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.580 | 6.128 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 742M | 63.8B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 1.21 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.23 | 3.79 | 191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.47 | 26.93 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.23 | 38.68 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.53 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers