Ad is loading...
EET vs QLD
EET vs QLD Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EET vs. QLD commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EET is a Hold and QLD is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 6.59B vs. EET (23.5M). EET has a higher annual dividend yield than QLD: EET (10.313) vs QLD (-13.984). EET was incepted earlier than QLD: EET (16 years) vs QLD (19 years). EET (0.95) and QLD (0.95) have comparable expense ratios .
| EET | QLD | EET / QLD | |
| Gain YTD | 10.313 | -13.984 | -74% |
| Net Assets | 23.5M | 6.59B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.95 | 100% |
| Turnover | N/A | 24.00 | - |
| Yield | 3.65 | 0.28 | 1,327% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QLD | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FDIS | 87.37 | 0.44 | +0.51% |
| Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discret ETF | |||
| MVF | 6.89 | 0.02 | +0.29% |
| BlackRock MuniVest Fund | |||
| TINY | 38.82 | N/A | N/A |
| ProShares Nanotechnology ETF | |||
| WTMF | 34.50 | -0.03 | -0.09% |
| WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy ETF | |||
| RPHS | 9.76 | -0.02 | -0.17% |
| Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF | |||
QLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLD | 100% | -0.17% | ||
| LRCX - QLD | 80% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| CDNS - QLD | 80% Closely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| KLAC - QLD | 78% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| SNPS - QLD | 78% Closely correlated | -0.33% | ||
| META - QLD | 77% Closely correlated | -0.92% | ||
More | ||||