EFA | WWJD | EFA / WWJD | |
Gain YTD | 20.206 | 19.302 | 105% |
Net Assets | 64.4B | 371M | 17,358% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.66 | 48% |
Turnover | 3.00 | 34.00 | 9% |
Yield | 2.76 | 2.47 | 112% |
Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
EFA | WWJD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago85% | 4 days ago78% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago70% | 4 days ago70% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago80% | 4 days ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago78% | 4 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago81% | 4 days ago85% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago77% | 4 days ago81% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 4 days ago86% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago80% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago77% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago73% | 4 days ago75% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFA has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFA jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WWJD has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WWJD jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WWJD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
WWJD | 100% | +0.44% | ||
BAM - WWJD | 72% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
BN - WWJD | 72% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
STM - WWJD | 68% Closely correlated | -0.13% | ||
BHP - WWJD | 67% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
RIO - WWJD | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.27% | ||
More |