EFAD | IHDG | EFAD / IHDG | |
Gain YTD | -0.098 | 2.922 | -3% |
Net Assets | 65.5M | 2.82B | 2% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 27.00 | 86.00 | 31% |
Yield | 2.28 | 1.67 | 136% |
Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
EFAD | IHDG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 11 days ago81% | 11 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 11 days ago72% | 11 days ago73% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 11 days ago74% | 11 days ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 11 days ago86% | 11 days ago80% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 11 days ago76% | 11 days ago79% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 11 days ago76% | 11 days ago72% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago79% | 11 days ago78% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago77% | 20 days ago74% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago82% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
A.I.dvisor tells us that EFAD and BNR have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EFAD and BNR's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EFAD | 100% | +0.37% | ||
BNR - EFAD | 14% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
UCB - EFAD | 8% Poorly correlated | +1.78% | ||
ROG - EFAD | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
APA - EFAD | 6% Poorly correlated | -2.98% | ||
NEM - EFAD | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.05% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IHDG has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IHDG jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IHDG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IHDG | 100% | +0.74% | ||
STM - IHDG | 75% Closely correlated | +2.75% | ||
ASML - IHDG | 66% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
AMP - IHDG | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.05% | ||
SAP - IHDG | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
CSL - IHDG | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.13% | ||
More |