Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EFAD vs IMTM
EFAD vs IMTM Comparison
Open Charts EFAD vs IMTM
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers
Price$42.76
Change+$0.13 (+0.30%)
Volume$154
Net Assets70.57M
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
Price$45.41
Change+$0.13 (+0.29%)
Volume$3.72K
Net Assets3.03B
EFAD vs IMTM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EFAD vs. IMTM commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFAD is a Buy and IMTM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMTM has more net assets: 3.03B vs. EFAD (70.6M). IMTM has a higher annual dividend yield than EFAD: IMTM (22.691) vs EFAD (17.107). EFAD was incepted earlier than IMTM: EFAD (11 years) vs IMTM (10 years). IMTM (0.30) has a lower expense ratio than EFAD (0.50). IMTM has a higher turnover EFAD (36.00) vs EFAD (36.00).
| EFAD | IMTM | EFAD / IMTM | |
| Gain YTD | 17.107 | 22.691 | 75% |
| Net Assets | 70.6M | 3.03B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.30 | 167% |
| Turnover | 36.00 | 70.00 | 51% |
| Yield | 2.33 | 2.45 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EFAD | IMTM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 76% | 18 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EFAD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFAD has been loosely correlated with LOGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EFAD jumps, then LOGI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFAD | 100% | +1.73% | ||
| LOGI - EFAD | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.65% | ||
| BNR - EFAD | 11% Poorly correlated | -9.97% | ||
| UCB - EFAD | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.17% | ||
| ROG - EFAD | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.90% | ||
| APA - EFAD | 6% Poorly correlated | +4.27% | ||
More | ||||
IMTM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMTM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMTM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMTM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMTM | 100% | +0.11% | ||
| BN - IMTM | 73% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| STM - IMTM | 70% Closely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| BNS - IMTM | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| TD - IMTM | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| BMO - IMTM | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
More | ||||