EFC
Price
$13.11
Change
-$0.09 (-0.68%)
Updated
Apr 3, 02:36 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
988.91M
34 days until earnings call
LADR
Price
$11.31
Change
-$0.09 (-0.79%)
Updated
Apr 3, 02:46 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.41B
21 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EFC vs LADR

Header iconEFC vs LADR Comparison
Open Charts EFC vs LADRBanner chart's image
Ellington Financial
Price$13.11
Change-$0.09 (-0.68%)
Volume$700
Capitalization988.91M
LADDER CAPITAL
Price$11.31
Change-$0.09 (-0.79%)
Volume$171
Capitalization1.41B
EFC vs LADR Comparison Chart
Loading...
EFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LADR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFC vs. LADR commentary
Apr 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFC is a Buy and LADR is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 03, 2025
Stock price -- (EFC: $13.19 vs. LADR: $11.40)
Brand notoriety: EFC and LADR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFC: 68% vs. LADR: 84%
Market capitalization -- EFC: $988.91M vs. LADR: $1.41B
EFC [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $988.91M. LADR’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $1.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLADR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LADR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EFC and LADR are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LADR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LADR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LADR is a better buy in the short-term than EFC.

Price Growth

EFC (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +0.38% price change this week, while LADR (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +0.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -1.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

EFC is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

LADR is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-1.61% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADR($1.41B) has a higher market cap than EFC($989M). LADR (13.49) and EFC (13.06) have similar P/E ratio . EFC YTD gains are higher at: 12.147 vs. LADR (3.960). LADR has less debt than EFC: LADR (3.18B) vs EFC (13.3B). LADR (269M) and EFC (257M) have equivalent revenues.
EFCLADREFC / LADR
Capitalization989M1.41B70%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.1473.960307%
P/E Ratio13.0613.4997%
Revenue257M269M96%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt13.3B3.18B419%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFC vs LADR: Fundamental Ratings
EFC
LADR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7073
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4672
SMR RATING
1..100
2729
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4650
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7848
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7549

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EFC's Valuation (25) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as LADR (48) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that EFC’s stock grew similarly to LADR’s over the last 12 months.

EFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as LADR (72) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that EFC’s stock grew similarly to LADR’s over the last 12 months.

EFC's SMR Rating (27) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as LADR (29) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that EFC’s stock grew similarly to LADR’s over the last 12 months.

EFC's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as LADR (50) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that EFC’s stock grew similarly to LADR’s over the last 12 months.

LADR's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as EFC (78) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that LADR’s stock grew similarly to EFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFCLADR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LADR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AUENX21.230.06
+0.28%
AQR Large Cap Defensive Style N
SEECX32.86N/A
N/A
Steward Values Enhanced Lg Cap I
NBREX24.44N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val Tr
OTCCX19.57N/A
N/A
MFS Mid Cap Growth C
BISMX20.62N/A
N/A
Brandes International Small Cap Equity I

EFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFC has been closely correlated with STWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFC jumps, then STWD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFC
1D Price
Change %
EFC100%
-0.45%
STWD - EFC
69%
Closely correlated
-0.10%
NLY - EFC
68%
Closely correlated
+0.15%
ACRE - EFC
67%
Closely correlated
-1.76%
LADR - EFC
66%
Closely correlated
N/A
TWO - EFC
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
More

LADR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LADR has been closely correlated with STWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LADR jumps, then STWD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LADR
1D Price
Change %
LADR100%
N/A
STWD - LADR
75%
Closely correlated
-0.10%
FBRT - LADR
70%
Closely correlated
-0.39%
RITM - LADR
67%
Closely correlated
+0.96%
EFC - LADR
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
BXMT - LADR
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
More