EFC
Price
$13.28
Change
-$0.33 (-2.43%)
Updated
Mar 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
988.91M
57 days until earnings call
TWO
Price
$13.87
Change
-$0.20 (-1.42%)
Updated
Mar 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.37B
55 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EFC vs TWO

Header iconEFC vs TWO Comparison
Open Charts EFC vs TWOBanner chart's image
Ellington Financial
Price$13.28
Change-$0.33 (-2.43%)
Volume$39.31K
Capitalization988.91M
Two Harbors Investment
Price$13.87
Change-$0.20 (-1.42%)
Volume$8.88K
Capitalization1.37B
EFC vs TWO Comparison Chart
Loading...
EFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFC vs. TWO commentary
Mar 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFC is a Hold and TWO is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 11, 2025
Stock price -- (EFC: $13.60 vs. TWO: $14.07)
Brand notoriety: EFC and TWO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFC: 153% vs. TWO: 138%
Market capitalization -- EFC: $988.91M vs. TWO: $1.37B
EFC [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $988.91M. TWO’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $1.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTWO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TWO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EFC is a better buy in the long-term than TWO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TWO’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TWO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EFC is a better buy in the short-term than TWO.

Price Growth

EFC (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -5.23% price change this week, while TWO (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -0.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

EFC is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

TWO is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-0.48% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TWO($1.37B) has a higher market cap than EFC($989M). TWO has higher P/E ratio than EFC: TWO (666.67) vs EFC (13.06). TWO YTD gains are higher at: 23.573 vs. EFC (14.501). TWO has less debt than EFC: TWO (1.89B) vs EFC (13.3B). EFC has higher revenues than TWO: EFC (257M) vs TWO (31.8M).
EFCTWOEFC / TWO
Capitalization989M1.37B72%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.50123.57362%
P/E Ratio13.06666.672%
Revenue257M31.8M808%
Total CashN/A1.25M-
Total Debt13.3B1.89B703%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFC vs TWO: Fundamental Ratings
EFC
TWO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
60100
SMR RATING
1..100
2795
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4141
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7847
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TWO's Valuation (9) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as EFC (16) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that TWO’s stock grew similarly to EFC’s over the last 12 months.

EFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TWO (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that EFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than TWO’s over the last 12 months.

EFC's SMR Rating (27) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for TWO (95) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that EFC’s stock grew significantly faster than TWO’s over the last 12 months.

EFC's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as TWO (41) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that EFC’s stock grew similarly to TWO’s over the last 12 months.

TWO's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as EFC (78) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that TWO’s stock grew similarly to EFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFCTWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BBIEX13.780.12
+0.88%
Bridge Builder International Equity
ARFFX15.690.11
+0.71%
Ariel Focus Investor
IRLUX42.380.19
+0.45%
Voya Russell Large Cap Index Port S2
AUUCX18.860.06
+0.32%
AB Select US Equity C
FSSMX43.610.07
+0.16%
Fidelity Stock Selector Mid Cap

EFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFC has been closely correlated with STWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFC jumps, then STWD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFC
1D Price
Change %
EFC100%
+0.97%
STWD - EFC
70%
Closely correlated
+2.34%
NLY - EFC
69%
Closely correlated
+2.53%
RITM - EFC
67%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
ACRE - EFC
67%
Closely correlated
+2.93%
TWO - EFC
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.44%
More

TWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TWO has been closely correlated with NLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TWO jumps, then NLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TWO
1D Price
Change %
TWO100%
+1.44%
NLY - TWO
75%
Closely correlated
+2.53%
IVR - TWO
74%
Closely correlated
+1.40%
ARR - TWO
73%
Closely correlated
+1.93%
AGNC - TWO
73%
Closely correlated
+2.37%
DX - TWO
71%
Closely correlated
+2.50%
More