Ad is loading...
EFRGF
Price
$0.45
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
JNCCF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 8 closing price
Ad is loading...

EFRGF vs JNCCF

Header iconEFRGF vs JNCCF Comparison
Open Charts EFRGF vs JNCCFBanner chart's image
Pasofino Gold
Price$0.45
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$11.35K
CapitalizationN/A
Metalite Resources
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
CapitalizationN/A
EFRGF vs JNCCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFRGF vs. JNCCF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFRGF is a Hold and JNCCF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (EFRGF: $0.45 vs. JNCCF: $0.01)
Brand notoriety: EFRGF and JNCCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFRGF: 174% vs. JNCCF: 66%
Market capitalization -- EFRGF: $41.53M vs. JNCCF: $1.1M
EFRGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $41.53M. JNCCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFRGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJNCCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EFRGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • JNCCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EFRGF is a better buy in the long-term than JNCCF.

Price Growth

EFRGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -3.38% price change this week, while JNCCF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -2.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.75%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-2.07% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFRGF($41.5M) has a higher market cap than JNCCF($1.1M). EFRGF YTD gains are higher at: 73.676 vs. JNCCF (-45.000). EFRGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -5.44M vs. JNCCF (-5.98M). EFRGF has more cash in the bank: 1.39M vs. JNCCF (252K). EFRGF (0) and JNCCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
EFRGFJNCCFEFRGF / JNCCF
Capitalization41.5M1.1M3,786%
EBITDA-5.44M-5.98M91%
Gain YTD73.676-45.000-164%
P/E RatioN/A2.01-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.39M252K550%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFRGF: Fundamental Ratings
EFRGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
30
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LQTY.X1.1226500.036910
+3.40%
Liquity cryptocurrency
MIR.X0.016837-0.000380
-2.21%
Mirror Protocol cryptocurrency
AAVE.X161.977190-6.722626
-3.98%
Aave cryptocurrency
BETA.X0.044336-0.002561
-5.46%
Beta Finance cryptocurrency
ZRX.X0.367563-0.034667
-8.62%
0x Protocol cryptocurrency

EFRGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EFRGF and SMPEF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EFRGF and SMPEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFRGF
1D Price
Change %
EFRGF100%
N/A
SMPEF - EFRGF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMINF - EFRGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.29%
TIHRF - EFRGF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRIRF - EFRGF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JNCCF - EFRGF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

JNCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JNCCF and AAMMF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JNCCF and AAMMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JNCCF
1D Price
Change %
JNCCF100%
N/A
AAMMF - JNCCF
31%
Poorly correlated
-8.80%
OICT - JNCCF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FDVXF - JNCCF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGMLF - JNCCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-14.03%
MDSMF - JNCCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More