EFSC vs FETM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFSC is a Hold and FETM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EFSC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFETM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- EFSC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- FETM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EFSC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FETM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EFSC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- FETM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
EFSC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -7.46% price change this week, while FETM (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.81% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.55%.
Reported Earning Dates
EFSC is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2025.
FETM is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-2.30% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| EFSC | FETM | EFSC / FETM | |
| Capitalization | 1.47B | 92.4M | 1,591% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.429 | 63.444 | 43% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.73 | 5.83 | 133% |
| Revenue | 550M | 61.3M | 897% |
| Total Cash | 193M | 100M | 193% |
| Total Debt | 204M | 259M | 79% |
EFSC | FETM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 14 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 18 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EFSC's Valuation (74) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FETM (77) in the null industry. This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to FETM’s over the last 12 months.
FETM's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as EFSC (45) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FETM’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.
EFSC's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FETM (52) in the null industry. This means that EFSC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FETM’s over the last 12 months.
FETM's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as EFSC (41) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FETM’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.
FETM's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as EFSC (18) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FETM’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.
| EFSC | FETM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 26% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 26% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 28% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 31% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 27% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 25% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 53% | 17 days ago 52% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 19% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 32% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 45% |
EFSC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFSC has been closely correlated with NWBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFSC jumps, then NWBI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFSC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFSC | 100% | -4.76% | ||
| NWBI - EFSC | 87% Closely correlated | -5.73% | ||
| NBTB - EFSC | 86% Closely correlated | -4.74% | ||
| BUSE - EFSC | 85% Closely correlated | -5.64% | ||
| PRK - EFSC | 85% Closely correlated | -6.41% | ||
| TRST - EFSC | 85% Closely correlated | -5.72% | ||
More | ||||
FETM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FETM has been loosely correlated with FUNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FETM jumps, then FUNC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FETM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FETM | 100% | -2.80% | ||
| FUNC - FETM | 43% Loosely correlated | -3.86% | ||
| FBNC - FETM | 32% Poorly correlated | -7.31% | ||
| HBNC - FETM | 32% Poorly correlated | -6.12% | ||
| EFSC - FETM | 32% Poorly correlated | -4.76% | ||
| PNFP - FETM | 31% Poorly correlated | -5.11% | ||
More | ||||