EFSC
Price
$60.12
Change
+$0.18 (+0.30%)
Updated
Jan 30 closing price
Capitalization
1.47B
87 days until earnings call
FFNW
Price
$21.36
Change
-$0.25 (-1.16%)
Updated
Jan 30 closing price
Capitalization
189.91M
83 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EFSC vs FFNW

Header iconEFSC vs FFNW Comparison
Open Charts EFSC vs FFNWBanner chart's image
Enterprise Financial Services
Price$60.12
Change+$0.18 (+0.30%)
Volume$161.47K
Capitalization1.47B
First Financial Northwest
Price$21.36
Change-$0.25 (-1.16%)
Volume$11.39K
Capitalization189.91M
EFSC vs FFNW Comparison Chart
Loading...
EFSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFNW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFSC vs. FFNW commentary
Jan 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFSC is a StrongBuy and FFNW is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 31, 2025
Stock price -- (EFSC: $60.12 vs. FFNW: $21.36)
Brand notoriety: EFSC and FFNW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFSC: 107% vs. FFNW: 39%
Market capitalization -- EFSC: $1.47B vs. FFNW: $189.91M
EFSC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.47B. FFNW’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $189.91M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFSC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFFNW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EFSC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FFNW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EFSC is a better buy in the long-term than FFNW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFSC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFNW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFSC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FFNW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFNW is a better buy in the short-term than EFSC.

Price Growth

EFSC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.77% price change this week, while FFNW (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

EFSC is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.

FFNW is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFSC($1.47B) has a higher market cap than FFNW($190M). FFNW has higher P/E ratio than EFSC: FFNW (30.00) vs EFSC (7.73). EFSC YTD gains are higher at: 6.596 vs. FFNW (-1.567). EFSC has more cash in the bank: 193M vs. FFNW (8.07M). FFNW has less debt than EFSC: FFNW (128M) vs EFSC (204M). EFSC has higher revenues than FFNW: EFSC (550M) vs FFNW (43.3M).
EFSCFFNWEFSC / FFNW
Capitalization1.47B190M774%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.596-1.567-421%
P/E Ratio7.7330.0026%
Revenue550M43.3M1,270%
Total Cash193M8.07M2,390%
Total Debt204M128M159%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFSC vs FFNW: Fundamental Ratings
EFSC
FFNW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
109
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4125
SMR RATING
1..100
1277
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4255
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
172
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3349

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EFSC's Valuation (75) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFNW (97) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to FFNW’s over the last 12 months.

FFNW's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (41) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FFNW’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFNW (77) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that EFSC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFNW’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFNW (55) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to FFNW’s over the last 12 months.

FFNW's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (17) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FFNW’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFSCFFNW
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
37%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EFSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFNW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AFCNX17.110.22
+1.30%
American Century Focused Intl Gr Inv
SMYIX25.13N/A
N/A
Franklin Global Equity I
FRIRX11.96N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income I
FMFMX16.32N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Series Equity Gr
PETZX15.14N/A
N/A
Gabelli Pet Parents'™