EFSC
Price
$65.87
Change
+$0.53 (+0.81%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.41B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FRME
Price
$43.30
Change
+$0.20 (+0.46%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.73B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFSC vs FRME

EFSC vs FRME Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFSC vs. FRME commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFSC is a Hold and FRME is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (EFSC: $65.34 vs. FRME: $43.30)
Brand notoriety: EFSC and FRME are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFSC: 37% vs. FRME: 82%
Market capitalization -- EFSC: $2.41B vs. FRME: $2.73B
EFSC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.41B. FRME’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFSC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFRME’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EFSC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FRME’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EFSC is a better buy in the long-term than FRME.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFSC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRME’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFSC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FRME’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRME is a better buy in the short-term than EFSC.

Price Growth

EFSC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.70% price change this week, while FRME (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

EFSC is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.

FRME is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.53% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRME($2.73B) has a higher market cap than EFSC($2.41B). FRME (12.77) and EFSC (12.43) have similar P/E ratio . EFSC YTD gains are higher at: 23.386 vs. FRME (17.703). EFSC has more cash in the bank: 259M vs. FRME (98.1M). EFSC has less debt than FRME: EFSC (413M) vs FRME (1.39B). FRME (660M) and EFSC (634M) have equivalent revenues.
EFSCFRMEEFSC / FRME
Capitalization2.41B2.73B88%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.38617.703132%
P/E Ratio12.4312.7797%
Revenue634M660M96%
Total Cash259M98.1M264%
Total Debt413M1.39B30%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFSC vs FRME: Fundamental Ratings
EFSC
FRME
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5092
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4475
SMR RATING
1..100
3541
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4548
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4141
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRME's Valuation (28) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (53). This means that FRME’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRME (75). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to FRME’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's SMR Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRME (41). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to FRME’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRME (48). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to FRME’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRME (41). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to FRME’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFSCFRME
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
62%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFSC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FRME
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZMAY25.99-0.04
-0.15%
Innovator Equity Dfnd Prt ETF -1 Yr May
FHDG36.36-0.13
-0.36%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Qt Dyn Buffr ETF
PICB22.93-0.18
-0.78%
Invesco International Corporate Bond ETF
TOLL40.23-0.34
-0.83%
Tema Durable Quality ETF
RVT17.92-0.19
-1.05%
Royce Value Trust

EFSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFSC has been closely correlated with FRME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFSC jumps, then FRME could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFSC
1D Price
Change %
EFSC100%
+0.81%
FRME - EFSC
87%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
BUSE - EFSC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
THFF - EFSC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
MBWM - EFSC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
SRCE - EFSC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.37%
More