EFSC
Price
$52.52
Change
+$0.90 (+1.74%)
Updated
Jun 6, 04:33 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.47B
52 days until earnings call
FUNC
Price
$29.78
Change
+$0.28 (+0.95%)
Updated
Jun 6, 04:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
152.19M
52 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFSC vs FUNC

Header iconEFSC vs FUNC Comparison
Open Charts EFSC vs FUNCBanner chart's image
Enterprise Financial Services
Price$52.52
Change+$0.90 (+1.74%)
Volume$300
Capitalization1.47B
First United
Price$29.78
Change+$0.28 (+0.95%)
Volume$100
Capitalization152.19M
EFSC vs FUNC Comparison Chart
Loading...
EFSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFSC vs. FUNC commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFSC is a Hold and FUNC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (EFSC: $51.57 vs. FUNC: $29.50)
Brand notoriety: EFSC and FUNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFSC: 67% vs. FUNC: 58%
Market capitalization -- EFSC: $1.47B vs. FUNC: $152.19M
EFSC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.47B. FUNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $152.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFSC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFUNC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EFSC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FUNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EFSC and FUNC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFSC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FUNC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFSC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FUNC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FUNC is a better buy in the short-term than EFSC.

Price Growth

EFSC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.12% price change this week, while FUNC (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

EFSC is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

FUNC is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.28% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFSC($1.47B) has a higher market cap than FUNC($152M). FUNC has higher P/E ratio than EFSC: FUNC (10.14) vs EFSC (7.73). EFSC YTD gains are higher at: -8.076 vs. FUNC (-11.206). EFSC has more cash in the bank: 193M vs. FUNC (86.9M). FUNC has less debt than EFSC: FUNC (112M) vs EFSC (204M). EFSC has higher revenues than FUNC: EFSC (550M) vs FUNC (71.3M).
EFSCFUNCEFSC / FUNC
Capitalization1.47B152M967%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-8.076-11.20672%
P/E Ratio7.7310.1476%
Revenue550M71.3M771%
Total Cash193M86.9M222%
Total Debt204M112M182%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFSC vs FUNC: Fundamental Ratings
EFSC
FUNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6058
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3136
SMR RATING
1..100
916
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5657
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2463
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUNC's Valuation (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (58). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (36). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's SMR Rating (9) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (16). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (57). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUNC (63). This means that EFSC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFSCFUNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIDAX18.57N/A
N/A
JHancock Financial Industries A
GSTKX19.48N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs International Eq Inc Inv
PIIFX29.89N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer International Equ A
JMGRX144.28N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Enterprise I
RECAX12.90N/A
N/A
RBC Emerging Markets Ex-China Equity A

FUNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUNC has been closely correlated with HTBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUNC jumps, then HTBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUNC
1D Price
Change %
FUNC100%
+0.27%
HTBK - FUNC
66%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
EFSC - FUNC
66%
Closely correlated
-0.65%
PNFP - FUNC
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
UCB - FUNC
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
SHBI - FUNC
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
More