EFSH vs MDU
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFSH is a Sell and MDU is a Sell.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EFSH’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDU’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EFSH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
- MDU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
| EFSH | MDU | EFSH / MDU | |
| Capitalization | 5.62M | 5.14B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -272.45K | 868M | -0% |
| Gain YTD | -99.865 | 72.090 | -139% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 10.78 | - |
| Revenue | 63.1M | 4.66B | 1% |
| Total Cash | 2.34M | 48.9M | 5% |
| Total Debt | 37.8M | 2.47B | 2% |
EFSH | MDU | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 97 | 26 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 1 Undervalued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 57 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 34 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 2 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EFSH's Valuation (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MDU (88) in the Gas Distributors industry. This means that EFSH’s stock grew significantly faster than MDU’s over the last 12 months.
MDU's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Gas Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for EFSH (100) in the null industry. This means that MDU’s stock grew significantly faster than EFSH’s over the last 12 months.
MDU's SMR Rating (57) in the Gas Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EFSH (100) in the null industry. This means that MDU’s stock grew somewhat faster than EFSH’s over the last 12 months.
MDU's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Gas Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EFSH (99) in the null industry. This means that MDU’s stock grew somewhat faster than EFSH’s over the last 12 months.
MDU's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Gas Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for EFSH (100) in the null industry. This means that MDU’s stock grew significantly faster than EFSH’s over the last 12 months.
| EFSH | MDU | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 45% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 7 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 17 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 54% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 59% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EMTY | 13.28 | 0.07 | +0.56% |
| ProShares Decline of the Retl Store ETF | |||
| GSY | 50.21 | 0.02 | +0.04% |
| Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF | |||
| DGRE | 25.29 | -0.10 | -0.39% |
| WisdomTree Emerging Mkts Qual Div Gr ETF | |||
| AHLT | 22.55 | -0.25 | -1.08% |
| American Beacon AHL Trend ETF | |||
| MODL | 40.00 | -0.55 | -1.36% |
| VictoryShares WestEnd U.S. Sector ETF | |||
EFSH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EFSH and MDU have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EFSH and MDU's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFSH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFSH | 100% | +8.76% | ||
| MDU - EFSH | 22% Poorly correlated | +2.52% | ||
| TUSK - EFSH | 21% Poorly correlated | -7.83% | ||
| CODI - EFSH | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.70% | ||
| ATI - EFSH | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.04% | ||
| IIIN - EFSH | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.20% | ||
More | ||||
MDU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDU has been loosely correlated with MATW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDU jumps, then MATW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDU | 100% | +2.52% | ||
| MATW - MDU | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.63% | ||
| TRC - MDU | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| NWPX - MDU | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| CODI - MDU | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| MLI - MDU | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.63% | ||
More | ||||