Ad is loading...
EGMSX vs MWCPX
EGMSX vs MWCPX Comparison
Open Charts EGMSX vs MWCPX
Eaton Vance Glb Macr Absolt Retrn R6
Price$8.50
Change-$0.04 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
TCW MetWest Unconstrained Bd Plan
Price$10.32
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.72B
EGMSX vs MWCPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EGMSX vs. MWCPX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGMSX is a Hold and MWCPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MWCPX has more cash in the bank: 2.72B vs. EGMSX (2.01B). MWCPX pays higher dividends than EGMSX: MWCPX (6.53) vs EGMSX (6.16). EGMSX was incepted earlier than MWCPX: EGMSX (8 years) vs MWCPX (5 years). EGMSX (1.14) is less costly to investors than MWCPX (0.69). MWCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 257.00 vs. EGMSX (156.00). EGMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than MWCPX: EGMSX (5000000) vs MWCPX (25000000). MWCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. EGMSX (7.67). EGMSX return over 5 years is better than : 30.45 vs. MWCPX (15.58).
| EGMSX | MWCPX | EGMSX / MWCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.69 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.69 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.239 | 1.855 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 25000000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 2.72B | 74% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.16 | 6.53 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.67 | 8.70 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.06 | 13.73 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.45 | 15.58 | 195% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...